Story telling: is it really research?

Area of Science:

• Qualitative Research Methods
• Hermeneutic Phenomenology

Background:

• Interpretive research presents unique challenges in establishing legitimacy.
• The concept of a 'research product' extends beyond traditional formats to include written, interpreted works.

Purpose of the Study:

• To propose a framework for considering narrative or story as a legitimate research product.
• To explore the complexities involved in creating acceptable and accessible interpretive research outputs.
• To guide researchers in validating their work within philosophical hermeneutics.

Main Methods:

• Focuses on five interrelated areas: journaling, observing, listening, writing, and rigor.
• Emphasizes a reflexive approach to the research process, questioning methodological underpinnings.
• Utilizes Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics to inform the notion of research legitimacy.

Main Results:

• Suggests that a well-sign-posted research product allows readers to assess its legitimacy.
• Highlights the importance of the entire research process as a reflexive exercise.
• Demonstrates how interpretive work, when communicated effectively, can be a valid research outcome.

Conclusions:

• Stories, as interpreted works, can be considered legitimate research products.
• Rigor in journaling, observation, listening, and writing is crucial for interpretive research.
• Clear sign-posting within the research narrative enhances reader understanding and validation.