Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Die Rolle der Randomisation in klinischen Studien

Koch, Abel

    Forschende Komplementarmedizin
    |January 20, 1999
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Randomised clinical trials are the gold standard, but non-randomised trials are also valuable. Well-designed observational studies can yield results comparable to randomised trials, highlighting the importance of robust study design.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    On Dr. Adams's Claim to Priority in Suggesting Depletion in Hydrophobia, &c.

    The Medical and physical journal·2018
    Same author

    A rare neuroresxic form of post-serotherapic paralysis.

    Revue medicale de Nancy·2010
    Same author

    The conditions for the collection of household waste from the point of view of hygiene.

    Annales d'hygiene et de medecine coloniales·2010
    Same author

    Recent data on penicillin and new antibiotics.

    Revue medicale de Nancy·2010
    Same author

    Unexplained Nausea and Vomiting.

    Current treatment options in gastroenterology·2000
    Same author

    Functional detection of chemopreventive glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical research methodology
    • Epidemiology
    • Medical ethics

    Background:

    • Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for treatment comparisons.
    • Controversies persist regarding the feasibility, adequacy, and ethical appropriateness of randomisation in clinical trials.
    • An overly critical stance towards non-randomised trials, often based on historical or pragmatic views, lacks epistemological support.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To argue for the necessity of non-randomised clinical trials.
    • To clarify the specific role and advantages of randomisation within clinical trial design.
    • To critically analyse arguments against the validity of observational studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and epistemological analysis of arguments surrounding randomisation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of results from randomised clinical trials and observational studies.
  • Identification of key differences and potential improvements in study design.

    • Main Results:

    • Non-randomised clinical trials are essential and have a valid place in medical research.
    • Well-designed and rigorously analysed observational studies have not been shown to produce results qualitatively different from RCTs.
    • The primary distinction between observational studies and RCTs should ideally be limited to the act of randomisation itself.

    Conclusions:

    • While randomisation is advisable when feasible, non-randomised studies remain crucial for clinical research.
    • Improvements in the design and analysis of observational studies are needed.
    • The epistemological basis supports the validity and utility of well-conducted non-randomised clinical trials alongside RCTs.