Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trials for Complex Therapies

Resch

    Forschende Komplementarmedizin
    |January 20, 1999
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    1) rheuma: komplementare therapien hoch im kurs; 2) ist der Ruckenschmerz magnetisch? 3) morbus alzheimer: unkonventionelle therapeutische Wundertute; 4) homocystein: Im westen nichts neues

    Forschende Komplementarmedizin und klassische Naturheilkunde = Research in complementary and natural classical medicine·2000
    Same author

    Manipulation of gold nanoparticles in liquid environments using scanning force microscopy

    Ultramicroscopy·2000
    Same author

    Study of the Dissolution of the Barium Sulfate (001) Surface with Hydrochloric Acid by Atomic Force Microscopy.

    Journal of colloid and interface science·1999
    Same author

    ac conductivity in La2CuO4.

    Physical review letters·1992

    Establishing causality is key for predicting intervention success. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are standard, alternative designs are often necessary when RCTs are infeasible, offering more flexibility for researchers.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical research methodology
    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Establishing a causal relationship between exposure and effect is crucial for predicting intervention outcomes.
    • Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for causality but are not always feasible.
    • Challenges include ethical constraints, rare diseases, patient/therapist reluctance, funding, and organizational limitations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore alternative study designs beyond the traditional randomized controlled trial (RCT) for establishing causality.
    • To highlight the importance of selecting appropriate designs tailored to specific research problems.
    • To emphasize the availability of numerous design alternatives for clinical research.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and discussion of various alternative study designs to the RCT.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examples include clinician-preferred treatment, single/double consent designs, prerandomization, cluster randomization, and response-adaptive designs.
  • Consideration of complex therapies and individualized treatment/outcome within RCT frameworks.

    • Main Results:

    • A variety of feasible alternative designs exist to overcome RCT limitations.
    • These designs can address issues like patient recruitment, resource constraints, and the complexity of interventions.
    • Modifications like open-label or optional cross-over can facilitate individualized treatment and outcome assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Researchers should prioritize finding suitable, appropriate study designs over forcing studies into standard, potentially awkward designs.
    • Numerous alternative designs exist, offering flexibility and enabling research where traditional RCTs are not viable.
    • Embracing diverse methodologies enhances the ability to answer critical research questions and predict intervention success.