[Evidence-based emergency medicine]

Evidence Based (Emergency) Medicine (EB(E)M is a term referring to the application into daily clinical practice of only those methods, procedures, medications etc. which are based on scientific evidence. Where diagnostic and therapeutic principles have not been validated on a prospective, controlled randomised basis, this should be tried out at a later time, if at all possible. This concept may allow to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice, and represents the major goal of EB(E)M. Protagonists of EBEM are at times confronted with criticism that EBEM does not constitute the only but one out of several possible approaches to quality controlled medical care. The fact that more than 50% of all emergency procedures are not evidence based give rise to the question as to whether the performance of randomised controlled studies is ethically justifiable, if control groups are included whose treatment leaves out generally recommended and recognised (though not evidence based) therapeutic and/or diagnostic principles. The following examples may enumerate some of the procedures, methods or medications, respectively, without proven scientific evidence: Medication for resuscitation of cardiac arrest victims. Medication for acute asthmatic attacks Initial treatment of uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock. Endotracheal intubation in VF/VT. The principle need for initial ventilation and the volumes of ventilation in cardiac arrest patients. Effectiveness of ACD- and VEST-CPR. A few typical examples are presented to illustrate the requirements of current study designs which have to be met before results of an evaluation are accepted by the EBEM scientists to obtain approval for application of a procedure, method or medication in clinical practice (large patient numbers, power calculations, ethical issues) as well as their benefits and drawbacks.