Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Crisis placement

J Adnopoz1

  • 1Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
|January 20, 1999
PubMed
Summary

This study examines factors affecting crisis placements for high-risk children. An intervention supports families to ensure child safety and permanence, reducing disruptions and multiple placements.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating systems of care for children: utility of the clinical case conference.

The American journal of orthopsychiatry·1997
Same author

The psychological effects of parental human immunodeficiency virus infection on uninfected children.

Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine·1996
Same author

Complicating the theory. The application of psychoanalytic concepts and understanding to family preservation.

The Psychoanalytic study of the child·1996
Same author

Children's mental health service needs and utilization patterns in an urban community: an epidemiological assessment.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·1992
Same author

Preventing out-of-home placement for high-risk children.

The Yale journal of biology and medicine·1990

Area of Science:

  • Child Welfare
  • Family Support Services
  • Risk Assessment in Child Protection

Background:

  • High-risk children often face crisis placements, leading to instability.
  • Current child protective service systems face barriers to effective risk-taking and decision-making.
  • Unwarranted family disruption and repeated placements negatively impact child well-being.

Observation:

  • Factors influencing crisis placements for high-risk children were reviewed.
  • An intervention strategy was developed to enhance child safety and permanence.
  • Barriers within child protective services were identified.

Findings:

  • The intervention focuses on supporting biological and kinship families.
  • Preventing unnecessary family disruption is a key component.
  • Reducing the need for multiple child placements is an outcome.

Implications:

  • Collaboration between child protection, health, and mental health professionals is crucial.
  • Improved decision-making in child protective services can enhance permanency.
  • This approach aims to ensure long-term safety and stability for vulnerable children.

Related Experiment Videos