Related Experiment Videos
Latex sensitization: occupational versus general population prevalence rates
1Ontario Ministry of Labour, Toronto, Canada. gary.liss@utoronto.ca
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
|January 23, 1999
Summary
Natural rubber latex (NRL) sensitization is a concern for healthcare workers. Studies show NRL allergy prevalence is low (<1%) in the general population, unlike higher rates in healthcare settings.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Immunology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Natural rubber latex (NRL) sensitization is an emerging occupational health issue, particularly for healthcare workers (HCWs).
- Some reports suggest NRL sensitization prevalence in occupationally exposed groups is similar to the general population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review prevalence studies and assess evidence comparing NRL sensitization in occupationally exposed and general populations.
- To determine if NRL sensitization rates differ significantly between HCWs and the general public.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of published prevalence studies on NRL sensitization.
- Analysis of data from healthcare workers and general population groups.
- Comparison of results from skin prick tests (SPT) and serum-specific IgE assays.
Main Results:
- Healthcare worker (HCW) NRL sensitization prevalence ranges from 5-12%, with potential clinical effects like asthma and anaphylaxis.
- General population NRL allergy prevalence is consistently low (<1%), confirmed by recent Finnish studies (0.7-1.1%) and SPT-based research (≤1%).
- Discrepancies exist with some serological assays suggesting higher prevalence (4-6.4%), but these assays may lack specificity.
Conclusions:
- Recent studies using skin testing support earlier findings of low NRL sensitization prevalence (<1%) in the general, occupationally unexposed population.
- Observed differences in prevalence between serological assays and skin testing warrant further investigation due to potential issues with assay specificity.