Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New methods in psychiatric epidemiology

A S Henderson1

  • 1National Health and Medical Research Council, Social Psychiatry Research Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.

Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
|January 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychiatric epidemiology now: some achievements and prospects.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2012
Same author

Examination stress in Singapore primary schoolchildren: how compliance by subjects can impact on study results.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2003
Same author

Memory complaints as a precursor of memory impairment in older people: a longitudinal analysis over 7-8 years.

Psychological medicine·2001
Same author

Age is no kinder to the better educated: absence of an association investigated using latent growth techniques in a community sample.

Psychological medicine·2001
Same author

Informant ratings of cognitive decline in old age: validation against change on cognitive tests over 7 to 8 years.

Psychological medicine·2000
Same author

Association of a functional polymorphism of the monoamine oxidase A gene promoter with personality and psychiatric symptoms.

Psychiatric genetics·2000
Same journal

From entertainment to clinical exposure: AI companions in Taiwanese psychiatric risk assessment.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
Same journal

The bodily self in fibromyalgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of body image, body representation, and interoceptive dysfunction.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Response to commentary "Hypnotic-associated falls across the diurnal cycle: Pharmacokinetic signal or delirium rhythm?"

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in psychiatry.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Reevaluation of Lateral Ventricular Enlargement in Psychiatry.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Characterizing social motivation deficits in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: Evidence from social incentive performance.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026
See all related articles

Epidemiological studies of mental disorders can now be compared across populations due to standardized criteria and assessments. Future research should use continuous symptom measures and test innovative etiological hypotheses.

Area of Science:

  • Mental health research
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry

Background:

  • Cross-population comparisons of mental disorder epidemiology are now feasible.
  • Methodological advancements enable more reliable comparisons.
  • Standardized diagnostic criteria (ICD-10, DSM-IV) and assessments are crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the current state of mental disorder epidemiology research.
  • To provide recommendations for future epidemiological studies.
  • To emphasize methodological rigor and innovative hypothesis testing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing standardized diagnostic criteria (ICD-10, DSM-IV).
  • Employing standardized clinical assessments (e.g., Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry, CIDI, DIS, Geriatric Mental State Examination).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Specifying populations at risk, age composition, and exclusions.

    • Main Results:

    • Comparisons between population samples are now cautiously possible.
    • Advances in methodology enhance the validity of epidemiological findings.
    • The value of continuous symptom measures alongside categorical diagnoses is highlighted.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardization in criteria and assessment tools is key for comparative mental disorder epidemiology.
    • Future studies should integrate continuous symptom measures and explore biological and psychosocial etiological factors.
    • Methodological rigor is essential for advancing the field.