Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Quality assurance by experts]

K Ulsenheimer1

  • 1Sozietät Rechtsanwälte Weinberger, Sottung and Kollegen, München. sozietaet@ra-weinberger.de

Zentralblatt Fur Gynakologie
|January 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Medical experts are crucial in malpractice cases due to lawyers' lack of expertise. Ensuring expert competence and understanding judicial demands is vital for fair court decisions and preventing miscarriages of justice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Patients' rights act. Consequences for medical treatment].

Der Anaesthesist·2014
Same author

[Legal liability problems in outpatient operations. View from an anesthesiological perspective].

Der Anaesthesist·2012
Same author

[Drafting expert opinion reports in medical liability processes].

Der Anaesthesist·2011
Same author

[Refusal of allogeneic blood transfusion by Jehovah's Witnesses. Perioperative management from a legal viewpoint].

Der Anaesthesist·2010
Same author

[New regulation of patient advance directives : What are the consequences for the practice?].

Der Anaesthesist·2010
Same author

[Delegation of medical responsibilities to non-medical personnel. Options and limits from a legal viewpoint].

Der Unfallchirurg·2009

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Forensic Medicine
  • Legal Medicine

Context:

  • Legal proceedings concerning professional malpractice heavily rely on medical expert testimony.
  • Lawyers often lack the specialized knowledge required to evaluate complex medical evidence.
  • The quality of court decisions is directly proportional to the accuracy and integrity of medical expert opinions.

Purpose:

  • To underscore the indispensable role of medical experts in malpractice litigation.
  • To highlight the critical factors influencing the quality and reliability of expert medical opinions.
  • To outline essential precepts for medical experts to ensure judicial accuracy.

Summary:

  • Court decisions in malpractice cases are contingent upon the competence of medical experts and their grasp of judicial expectations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experts must understand their role, legal standards, and causality requirements in civil and criminal proceedings.
  • Key principles include objectivity, clear communication, adherence to one's specialty, timely reporting, intellectual honesty, and avoiding legal judgments.

    • Impact:

    • Adherence to these principles by medical experts is essential for preventing miscarriages of justice.
    • Effective quality control of expert medical opinions is paramount for the integrity of the legal system.
    • Ensuring the professional competence and judicial awareness of medical experts upholds fairness in malpractice hearings.