Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length

The effects of proximal bonding, distal stem geometry, and femoral neck length on cement and interface stresses were determined to understand better their role in clinical performance. The effects of stem design were compared with the effects of environmental variables, patient weight, and patient activity. Finite element models were used to determine peak cement and interface stresses, and an experimental layout was used to separate design and environmental effects. Bonding reduced cement mantle stresses by 35% to 60%, to levels below the cement fatigue strength. A flat sided implant provided more torsional resistance, reducing shear stresses at the proximal cement-prosthesis interface by 22% to 73% with respect to a distal round implant. Neck length had minimal effects on stresses compared with bonding or implant geometry. Cement-bone interface stresses were more sensitive to patient activity than to the design variables. Therefore, claims that a strong cement and prosthesis bond may be harmful to the bone-cement interface are unjustified based on these results. The best combination of design variables was a proximally bonded, flat sided implant with neck length left to the surgeon's discretion. This combination was most effective at protecting the cement mantle and prosthesis interface and perhaps the cement-bone interface by minimizing stresses associated with cement debris generation.