Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study

A M Henson1, W H Slattery, W M Luxford

  • 1The House Ear Institute and Clinic, Los Angeles, California 90057, USA.

The American Journal of Otology
|January 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Asymmetric-cut variable-incident-angle monochromator.

The Review of scientific instruments·2012
Same author

Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

Multi-layered PZT/polymer composites to increase signal-to-noise ratio and resolution for medical ultrasound transducers.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2008
Same author

A new high-speed beam chopper for time-resolved X-ray studies.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2006
Same author

Performance limits of direct cryogenically cooled silicon monochromators - experimental results at the APS.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2006
Same author

The historical development of cryogenically cooled monochromators for third-generation synchrotron radiation sources.

Journal of synchrotron radiation·2006
Same journal

Conservative facial nerve management in jugular foramen schwannomas.

The American journal of otology·2000
Same journal

Histopathology of Ménière's disease.

The American journal of otology·2000
Same journal

Fibrous dysplasia of the temporal bone.

The American journal of otology·2000
Same journal

The history of the microscope for use in ear surgery.

The American journal of otology·2000
Same journal

Cerebellopontine angle involvement by nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

The American journal of otology·2000
Same journal

Practical aspects for optimal registration (matching) on the lateral skull base with an optical frameless computer-aided pointer system.

The American journal of otology·2000
See all related articles

Replacement cochlear implants can significantly alter auditory performance, with outcomes varying widely. Patients should be counseled on potential changes in sound quality and speech recognition after reimplantation.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) are vital for restoring hearing in severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.
  • Device failure necessitates reimplantation, raising questions about performance consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare auditory performance between original and replacement Nucleus 22 cochlear implants.
  • To evaluate objective and subjective outcomes following CI reimplantation.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective chart review of 28 adults across 18 U.S. CI programs.
  • Objective speech discrimination tests (sentence and word) and subjective patient questionnaires were used.

Main Results:

  • 37% of patients showed improved scores, 26% had no change, and 37% experienced poorer scores with replacement CIs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjectively, 57% found replacement device performance better or same; 43% reported poorer performance.
  • No correlation found between outcomes and device failure cause, duration, surgical factors, or patient demographics.
  • Conclusions:

    • Reimplantation of cochlear implants can lead to significant changes in speech recognition ability.
    • Patients undergoing reimplantation require thorough counseling on potential variations in auditory performance and sound quality.