Evaluation of surgeries for rheumatoid shoulder based on the destruction pattern

To identify the optimal treatment of rheumatoid shoulder, we analyzed the clinical results of shoulder surgeries according to each type of shoulder destruction pattern.

Forty-seven shoulder surgeries for rheumatoid arthritis (18 arthroscopic synovectomies, 10 total shoulder replacements, 19 humeral head replacements) were assessed clinically and compared in regard to 5 different destruction patterns of rheumatoid shoulder (nonprogressive, arthrosis-like, erosive, collapse, and mutilating patterns).

For nonprogressive-type shoulders, we were able to obtain both pain relief and range of motion (ROM) improvement with arthroscopic synovectomy. For erosive-type shoulders, we could obtain pain relief but no ROM improvement with synovectomy; and we obtained both pain relief and ROM improvement with prosthetic replacement. For the collapse-type shoulders, we could not obtain pain relief or ROM improvement with arthroscopic synovectomy, but did obtain pain relief with prosthetic replacement. For mutilating-type shoulders, we could obtain only pain relief with prosthetic replacement. The results of the various surgeries for rheumatoid shoulder were distinctly different depending on the shoulder destruction patterns.

These findings could be of value for the selection of treatment, including a surgical procedure, for rheumatoid shoulders. For the nonprogressive-type and for erosive-type shoulders before bone destruction progresses, arthroscopic synovectomy should be selected. For erosive-type shoulders after bone destruction, for the collapse-type, and for mutilating-type shoulders, prosthetic replacement should be selected. In regard to the prosthetic replacement, the humeral component should be cemented because the incidence of migration in noncemented humeral component procedures was high.