Related Experiment Videos
Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved?
M K Marvel1, R M Epstein, K Flowers
1Fort Collins Family Medicine Residency Program, CO, USA. mkm@libra.pvh.org
JAMA
|January 26, 1999
Summary
Physicians often interrupt patients, limiting their ability to fully express concerns. Allowing patients to complete their statements improves data collection and interview efficiency, reducing late-arising issues.
Area of Science:
- Medical Communication
- Family Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Physicians often prioritize a single patient issue before understanding the full scope of concerns.
- Effective communication is crucial for comprehensive patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess how experienced family physicians elicit patient concerns in different practice settings.
- To analyze the impact of physician communication strategies on patient disclosure.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional survey utilizing linguistic analysis of 264 patient-physician interviews.
- Data collected on physician solicitations, patient response completion, and timing of concerns.
Main Results:
- Physicians solicited concerns in 75.4% of interviews; patients completed initial statements in only 28.0%.
- Redirecting patients after a brief period (mean 23.1s) did not significantly increase interview time but reduced concern completion.
- Late-arising concerns were more frequent when physicians did not solicit patient agendas (34.9% vs 14.9%).
Conclusions:
- Physicians frequently interrupt patients, hindering the complete articulation of concerns.
- Soliciting patient agendas is time-efficient and enhances data yield, improving interview efficiency.
- Improved communication practices can lead to better patient data collection and potentially better health outcomes.