Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats
Published on: February 23, 2015
Extinction after regular and irregular reward schedules in the infant rat: influence of age and training duration
M W Lilliquist1, H P Nair, F Gonzalez-Lima
1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin 78712, USA.
Insights
Infant rats trained with patterned single alternation (PSA) showed faster extinction than those trained with partial reinforcement (PRF) when discrimination was learned. Early extinction training in PSA led to slower extinction, similar to PRF.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral neuroscience
- Animal behavior
- Learning and memory
Background:
- The partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) describes greater persistence in extinction after inconsistent rewards.
- Understanding PREE in early development is crucial for learning models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate extinction rates in infant rats under different partial reinforcement schedules.
- To compare random partial reinforcement (PRF) and patterned single alternation (PSA) extinction rates.
- To examine the impact of age and training onset on extinction behavior.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments compared extinction rates of infant rat pups under continuous reinforcement (CRF), PRF, and PSA schedules.
- Extinction was measured by response persistence after reward withdrawal.
- Age-dependent effects were assessed using 12-day-old and 17-day-old pups.
Main Results:
- 17-day-old pups trained with PSA showed extinction rates similar to CRF.
- Early extinction training in PSA prior to discrimination acquisition resulted in prolonged, PRF-like extinction curves.
- 12-day-old pups exhibited no reward-schedule-related differences in extinction, despite acquisition differences.
Conclusions:
- Results suggest a modification of Amsel's discrimination learning model.
- A dissociation between different reward expectancies may exist in younger subjects.
- Age and training methodology significantly influence extinction persistence and learning in infant rats.
Abstract:
Greater persistence in extinction is observed following inconsistent reward compared to that observed following consistent reward, an effect termed the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE). We report three experiments in which the extinction rates of random partially reinforced (PRF) or continuously reinforced (CRF) infant rat pups were compared to the extinction rate of pups trained with an alternative and regular schedule of partial reinforcement, known as patterned single alternation (PSA). In PSA, subjects learn to alternate speed of responding in anticipation of the regular alternation of reward and nonreward trials in the straight alley runway. In Experiment 1, 17-day-old PSA subjects showed CRF-like extinction rates; whereas in Experiment 2, in which extinction was initiated early in training prior to the onset of the PSA discrimination, PSA subjects showed prolonged, PRF-like extinction curves. In contrast, 12-day-old pups in Experiment 3 showed no reward-schedule-related differences in extinction, despite differences in behavior during acquisition. These results prompt a modification of Amsel's (1962) model of discrimination learning, and suggest the existence of a dissociation between different types of reward-related expectancies in the younger subjects.
Related Concept Videos
Law of Effect
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

