Extinction after regular and irregular reward schedules in the infant rat: influence of age and training duration

M W Lilliquist1, H P Nair, F Gonzalez-Lima

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin 78712, USA.

Insights

Infant rats trained with patterned single alternation (PSA) showed faster extinction than those trained with partial reinforcement (PRF) when discrimination was learned. Early extinction training in PSA led to slower extinction, similar to PRF.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral neuroscience
  • Animal behavior
  • Learning and memory

Background:

  • The partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) describes greater persistence in extinction after inconsistent rewards.
  • Understanding PREE in early development is crucial for learning models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate extinction rates in infant rats under different partial reinforcement schedules.
  • To compare random partial reinforcement (PRF) and patterned single alternation (PSA) extinction rates.
  • To examine the impact of age and training onset on extinction behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments compared extinction rates of infant rat pups under continuous reinforcement (CRF), PRF, and PSA schedules.
  • Extinction was measured by response persistence after reward withdrawal.
  • Age-dependent effects were assessed using 12-day-old and 17-day-old pups.

Main Results:

  • 17-day-old pups trained with PSA showed extinction rates similar to CRF.
  • Early extinction training in PSA prior to discrimination acquisition resulted in prolonged, PRF-like extinction curves.
  • 12-day-old pups exhibited no reward-schedule-related differences in extinction, despite acquisition differences.

Conclusions:

  • Results suggest a modification of Amsel's discrimination learning model.
  • A dissociation between different reward expectancies may exist in younger subjects.
  • Age and training methodology significantly influence extinction persistence and learning in infant rats.

Related Concept Videos

Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...