Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis

D E Weiland1, R C Bay, S Del Sordi

  • 1Department of Surgery, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

American Journal of Surgery
|February 2, 1999
PubMed
Summary

For secure abdominal wound closure, continuous nonabsorbable sutures are recommended. Mass closures are superior to layered closures, and interrupted absorbable sutures are best for infected or distended wounds.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Parent vs burn-injured child self-report: contributions to a better understanding of anxiety levels.

Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association·2013
Same author

Rapid optical method for logging dust concentration versus depth in glacial ice.

Applied optics·2008
Same author

Limits on diffuse fluxes of high energy extraterrestrial neutrinos with the AMANDA-B10 detector.

Physical review letters·2003
Same author

Observation of high-energy neutrinos using Cerenkov detectors embedded deep in Antarctic ice.

Nature·2001
Same author

Professionalism and professional values in orthopaedics.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2000
Same author

Can professional values be taught? A look at residency training.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2000

Area of Science:

  • Surgical techniques
  • Wound healing
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Current abdominal wound closure practices often rely on tradition rather than data.
  • Secure wound closure is critical for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of different abdominal wound closure methods using statistical data.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for surgical wound closure.

Main Methods:

  • A meta-analysis of 12,249 patients undergoing abdominal wound closure.
  • Comparison of continuous versus interrupted, and mass versus layered closure techniques.
  • Evaluation of absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Continuous absorbable sutures were associated with more hernias (P = 0.0007).
  • Continuous nonabsorbable sutures led to significantly more dehiscences (P = 0.01).
  • Mass closures showed fewer hernias and dehiscences than layered closures (P = 0.02, P = 0.0002).

    • Conclusions:

    • Continuous nonabsorbable sutures are recommended for most abdominal wound closures.
    • Interrupted absorbable sutures are preferred when infection or distention is anticipated.
    • Mass closure techniques are superior to layered closures for reducing hernias and dehiscences.