Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical guidelines: ways ahead

C W Onion1, T Walley

  • 1Wirral Health Authority, St Catherine's Hospital, Birkenhead, UK.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|February 2, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current Controversies in Therapeutics.

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London·2019
Same author

The Iranian health insurance system; past experiences, present challenges and future strategies.

Iranian journal of public health·2012
Same author

Health care financing in iran; is privatization a good solution?

Iranian journal of public health·2012
Same author

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of genotyping for CYP2D6 for the management of women with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: a systematic review.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2011
Same author

Physicians medication prescribing in primary care in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Literature review, part 1: variations in drug prescribing.

Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit·2011
Same author

Physicians' medication prescribing in primary care in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Literature review, part 2: rational prescribing.

Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit·2011
Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
See all related articles

Clinical guidelines are crucial for evidence-based practice in healthcare. This study explores two approaches to guideline development: prioritizing evidence strength versus prioritizing practical simplicity, and considers integration strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Clinical guidelines are vital for implementing evidence-based practice in healthcare systems like the National Health Service (NHS).
  • Two distinct philosophies exist regarding guideline development and implementation.
  • These philosophies present a trade-off between the rigor of evidence and the practicality of application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the merits and flaws of two contrasting approaches to clinical guideline development.
  • To explore strategies for integrating the strengths of both evidence-based rigor and practical simplicity.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the theoretical underpinnings of two schools of thought on guideline development.
  • Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages inherent in each approach.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of potential methods for synthesizing these divergent strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Guidelines prioritizing evidence may become overly complex and impractical for widespread use.
    • Guidelines prioritizing simplicity may compromise the strength and reliability of the evidence base.
    • Both approaches have inherent limitations that need to be addressed.

    Conclusions:

    • A balanced approach is needed to create clinical guidelines that are both evidence-based and practical.
    • Integrating the strengths of rigorous evidence and user-friendly design is key for effective implementation.
    • Further consideration of hybrid models can enhance the utility of clinical guidelines.