Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physiological obstacles after xenotransplantation

C Hammer1

  • 1Institut für Chirurgische Forschung, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany. hammer@icf.med.uni-muenchen.de

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|February 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human genomics of the humoral immune response against polyomaviruses.

Virus evolution·2021
Same author

The Summer School Oncology Groningen: Improving a Successful International Course by Refining the Old, Maintaining What's Good.

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2021
Same author

<i>Ex situ</i> management of Beira antelope <i>Dorcatragus megalotis</i> at Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation, Qatar.

The International zoo yearbook·2020
Same author

[Lean management in the pathology laboratory].

Der Pathologe·2017
Same author

SU-E-T-137: The Response of TLD-100 in Mixed Fields of Photons and Electrons.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Radiation-induced fibrosis in the boost area after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost technique for early-stage breast cancer: A multivariable prediction model.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2016
Same journal

Multiomics Profiling During Autoimmune Demyelination Highlights a Complex Regulatory Role for Ataxin-1 in B Cells.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Global Trends in Light Pollution and Their Relationship With Socioeconomic Factors.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Wired for Corruption: Inter-Brain Synchrony Encodes Bribery-Related Value Information and Predicts Bribery Agreement.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

LM-YOLO: A Lightweight Multi-Scale Enhanced Model for Forest Smoke Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same journal

DARTS-CNN-BiLSTM: Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Computer Numerical Control Machine Tool Feed System.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
See all related articles

Xenografts face significant incompatibility due to unique human anatomy and diverse humoral/enzymatic factors. Species-specific differences in proteins like albumin and complement pose major challenges for xenotransplantation survival.

Area of Science:

  • Transplantation immunology
  • Comparative physiology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Allograft incompatibility is primarily immunologic (MHC antigens).
  • Xenografts present unique anatomical, physiological, and biochemical challenges not seen in allografts.
  • Human upright posture and gravity uniquely affect organ anatomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the profound differences between allograft and xenograft incompatibility.
  • To explore the humoral and enzymatic barriers in xenotransplantation.
  • To assess the potential for long-term xenograft survival in humans.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of anatomical and physiological factors.
  • Examination of humoral and enzymatic differences between species (pig and human).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of molecular incompatibilities, including albumin and complement systems.

    • Main Results:

    • Xenografts exhibit significant anatomical and physiological disparities compared to allografts.
    • Species-specific differences in growth hormone regulation, enzyme metabolism, and protein binding sites (albumin) are critical.
    • Major incompatibilities exist in complement systems, potentially triggering adverse reactions in recipients.

    Conclusions:

    • Xenotransplantation faces substantial hurdles beyond immunologic rejection, including anatomical, physiological, and biochemical incompatibilities.
    • Species-specific molecular interactions, particularly with proteins like albumin and complement, are critical determinants of xenograft viability.
    • Long-term xenograft survival remains uncertain due to these complex, multifactorial incompatibilities.