Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. A biomechanical study

We compared two different subtrochanteric fracture fixation techniques, an intramedullary hip screw system (IMHS) and an extramedullary, dual sliding screw-plate system (MSP), to determine relative fixation stability. 6 matched pairs of osteosynthesized osteopenic cadaver femurs were axially loaded to 1000 N with concurrent, simulated abductor forces of 0%, 50%, or 86% of the applied head force. The initial loading sequence was made with uniaxial dynamization--the lag screw of the MSP locked and distal locking of the IMHS nail. Femoral head displacement and medial femoral strain were measured for intact femur controls, after fixation of a 2-part reverse oblique subtrochanteric fracture and finally a 3-part reverse oblique subtrochanteric fracture with a lateral wedge defect. The samples were then loaded at 750 N for 10(4) cycles with both devices uniaxially locked, followed by 10(4) cycles with both devices fully biaxially dynamized (unlocked). For the 2-part subtrochanteric fracture pattern, both devices exhibited similar inferior displacements of the femoral head (average 2.0 mm) and medial femoral strain (approximately 70% of intact). Increasing abductor forces decreased medial compressive strain but did not significantly affect head displacement. For the 3-part fracture model, the MSP demonstrated significantly less inferior displacement of the head (1.6 mm vs. 2.1 mm) and both devices demonstrated significantly decreased medial strain. After cycling, head displacement increased approximately 50% in both devices and medial strain increased slightly. After unlocking and cycling, the MSP group showed significant lateral displacement of the proximal fragment. The IMHS and MSP devices provide similar stability for fixation of 2-part and 3-part reverse oblique subtrochanteric fractures. In a biaxially dynamized, 3-part reverse oblique fracture, displacement of the proximal fragment can occur with the MSP.