Related Experiment Videos

Do sick newborn infants benefit from participation in a randomized clinical trial?

B Schmidt1, P Gillie, C Caco

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

The Journal of Pediatrics
|February 5, 1999
PubMed

Insights

Newborn infants in a clinical trial experienced shorter mechanical ventilation durations compared to eligible infants not enrolled. This suggests that participation in randomized controlled trials may benefit critically ill newborns.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Pediatric Critical Care

Background:

  • Adults in clinical trials often show improved outcomes compared to those eligible but not enrolled.
  • This study investigates if this phenomenon extends to newborn infants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if newborn infants randomized to a placebo in an investigational drug trial had better outcomes than infants eligible but not randomized (eligible NR).

Main Methods:

  • Prospective data collection on 76 eligible NR infants in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of antithrombin therapy for respiratory distress syndrome.
  • Comparison of outcomes between eligible NR infants and 61 infants randomized to placebo.
  • Standardized use of exogenous surfactant in all infants.

Main Results:

  • Infants in the placebo group had a median mechanical ventilation duration of 4.8 days, reduced from 6.2 days in the eligible NR group (P =.008).
  • A trend towards less frequent and severe intraventricular hemorrhage was observed in trial participants.
  • Demographic characteristics (birth weight, gestational age, sex) were similar between groups.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the hypothesis that sick newborn infants may benefit from participating in randomized controlled trials.
  • Clinical trial participation may lead to improved outcomes in neonatal intensive care settings.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos