Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological issues in mammography double reading studies

L J Williams1, M Hartswood, R J Prescott

  • 1Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh.

Journal of Medical Screening
|February 6, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term life satisfaction in ageing women with work disability due to mental and musculoskeletal disorders.

Maturitas·2023
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Comorbidity of mental and musculoskeletal disorders in ageing women: A data linkage study using national registries.

Maturitas·2021
Same author

Validation of a combined ELISA to detect IgG, IgA and IgM antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in mild or moderate non-hospitalised patients.

Journal of immunological methods·2021
Same author

Whole blood interleukin-2 release test to detect and characterize rare circulating gluten-specific T cell responses in coeliac disease.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2021
Same author

Repurposing a fracture risk calculator (FRAX) as a screening tool for women at risk for sarcopenia.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same journal

Cost-benefit analysis of an organized community-based multi-cancer screening program in Bangladesh.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Response to: Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination with a more plausible assumption.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Response to Takahashi regarding Bestwick and Wald: Mischaracterisation of evidence in prostate cancer screening.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

No-cost envelope modification improves fecal immunochemical test laboratory acceptance in a US Veterans Affairs colorectal cancer screening trial.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Prostate cancer screening: The level of the evidence hierarchy.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Prediction model to prioritize colorectal cancer screening with visual colonoscopy.

Journal of medical screening·2026
See all related articles

Double reading in cancer screening improves detection rates, but the extent of improvement varies significantly. This study proposes a method to accurately calculate the cancer detection rate increase from a second reader.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • National breast screening programs utilize mammography for early cancer detection.
  • The effectiveness of single versus double reading in interpreting screening mammograms is a subject of ongoing research.
  • Disparate results across studies necessitate a clear understanding of assessment methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically appraise methodologies for comparing cancer detection rates in single versus double reading studies.
  • To clarify the interpretation of varying results from double reading studies in cancer detection.
  • To propose a standardized method for calculating the increase in cancer detection rate attributed to a second reader.

Main Methods:

  • Critical appraisal of existing methodologies used in double reading studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data from national breast screening programs.
  • Evaluation of the impact of study blinding and statistical methods on reported cancer detection rates.

    • Main Results:

    • The reported improvement in cancer detection rate with double reading is highly variable across studies.
    • Study blinding and the specific statistical methods employed significantly influence the observed improvement.
    • A novel method for calculating the cancer detection rate increase due to a second reader is presented.

    Conclusions:

    • Methodological variations in double reading studies lead to inconsistent reported improvements in cancer detection rates.
    • A standardized approach is needed to accurately assess the benefit of a second reader in cancer screening.
    • The proposed calculation method aims to provide a clearer interpretation of double reading efficacy.