Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

High Throughput, Real-time, Dual-readout Testing of Intracellular Antimicrobial Activity and Eukaryotic Cell Cytotoxicity
Published on: November 16, 2016
Comparative tolerability of erythromycin and newer macrolide antibacterials in paediatric patients
1Paediatric Department IV, University of Milan, L. Sacco Hospital, Italy.
Abstract:
The macrolides are a well established group of antibacterials frequently used in general practice. The most frequently used macrolides in paediatric patients are erythromycin, a naturally occurring compound, and clarithromycin and azithromycin, recently developed macrolides. Overall adverse effect rates of 7 to 26% for erythromycin, 14 to 26% for clarithromycin, and 6 to 27% for azithromycin have been described in children. Adverse gastrointestinal effects, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal cramps, are the most common problems in children. Allergic reactions, hepatotoxicity, ototoxicity and adverse effects involving the central and peripheral nervous systems have also been observed in children. Stevens-Johnson, Schonlein-Henoch and Churg-Strauss syndromes have been rarely described in children. Treatment-related laboratory abnormalities have been recorded in 2 to 4% of erythromycin- and in 0 to 1% of both clarithromycin- and azithromycin-treated children. Elevation in liver function tests was the most common abnormality cited. Increased macrolide use in children in recent years has resulted in a growing potential for drug interactions between them and other pharmacologically active agents via the inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) microsomal enzymes. Drug interactions with theophylline, cyclosporin, carbamazepine, terfenadine and warfarin limit erythromycin use. Clarithromycin is a weak inducer of CYP and exhibits fewer drug-drug interactions than erythromycin. However, its use with theophylline, carbamazepine and terfenadine is contraindicated. In contrast, no significant interactions have been reported with azithromycin to date. Macrolides have been proven to be well tolerated in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and also in less frequent infections occurring in paediatric patients. In addition, clarithromycin and azithromycin have shown good tolerability profiles in immunocompromised paediatric patients. In conclusion, macrolides antibacterials have proven to be well tolerated in paediatric patients. Although the incidence of adverse effects is similar with the use of erythromycin and the newer macrolides, drug interactions occur significantly less when clarithromycin or azithromycin are administered.
Insights
Macrolide antibiotics like erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin are generally well-tolerated in children. Newer macrolides, clarithromycin and azithromycin, have fewer drug interactions than erythromycin.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Agents
Background:
- Macrolides are a common class of antibacterials used in pediatric practice.
- Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin are frequently prescribed macrolides for children.
- Understanding their safety and interaction profiles is crucial for effective pediatric treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the adverse effect profiles of commonly used macrolides in pediatric patients.
- To compare the incidence of adverse effects and drug interactions among erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.
- To assess the tolerability of macrolides in various pediatric infections, including in immunocompromised patients.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of adverse effect rates and drug interaction potentials of macrolides in children.
- Analysis of reported side effects, including gastrointestinal issues, allergic reactions, and laboratory abnormalities.
- Examination of drug interactions mediated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes.
Main Results:
- Adverse effect rates for erythromycin (7-26%), clarithromycin (14-26%), and azithromycin (6-27%) are comparable in children, with gastrointestinal effects being most common.
- Erythromycin exhibits significant drug interactions via CYP inhibition, while clarithromycin has fewer interactions but some contraindications.
- Azithromycin has shown no significant drug interactions to date, and all three macrolides are well-tolerated in various pediatric infections.
Conclusions:
- Macrolide antibacterials are well-tolerated in pediatric patients for common infections.
- While adverse effect incidence is similar, clarithromycin and azithromycin present a significantly lower risk of drug interactions compared to erythromycin.
- The newer macrolides, clarithromycin and azithromycin, offer improved safety profiles regarding drug interactions in pediatric populations.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
