Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic splenectomy: evolution and current status

P J Klingler1, G G Tsiotos, K S Glaser

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.

Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy
|February 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of atraumatic fibrin sealant vs. staple mesh fixation in TAPP hernia repair on chronic pain and quality of life: results of a randomized controlled study.

Surgical endoscopy·2011
Same author

Collagen implants in inguinal and ventral hernia repair.

Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research·2010
Same author

Adverse effects of polyvinylidene fluoride-coated polypropylene mesh used for laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay repair of incisional hernia.

The British journal of surgery·2010
Same author

The assessment of quality of life in a trial on lightweight mesh fixation with fibrin sealant in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2008
Same author

A question of gas.

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver·2007
Same author

New legislative regulations, problems, and future perspectives, with a particular emphasis on surgical education.

Journal of postgraduate medicine·2004
Same journal

Argon beam coagulation in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

Endo-organ and laparoscopic management of gastric leiomyomas.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

Laparoscopic treatment of duodenal diverticulum.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

VATS-stepwise resection of a giant bulla in an oxygen-dependent patient.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

Laparoscopic port site metastasis of an undetected primary tumor.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
Same journal

Right-sided colonic diverticulitis mimicking acute cholecystitis in pregnancy: case report and laparoscopic treatment.

Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy·1999
See all related articles

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is recommended for spleens up to 20 cm, offering fewer complications and shorter hospital stays than open surgery. However, it has longer operation times and is less sensitive for accessory spleens.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical techniques
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Gastrointestinal surgery

Background:

  • Splenectomy is a common surgical procedure.
  • Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery.
  • Indications and optimal surgical approaches for LS require clear definition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and assess the indications for laparoscopic splenectomy (LS).
  • To evaluate the surgical approach to LS.
  • To propose recommendations for the surgical approach to LS.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of published reports on LS.
  • Analysis of 32 articles encompassing 643 patients (549 adults, 94 children) from August 1994 to May 1997.
  • Detailed examination of indications, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is recommended for spleens with a maximum diameter of 20 cm.
  • LS demonstrates fewer perioperative complications, reduced morbidity, and shorter hospital stays compared to open splenectomy.
  • Disadvantages include longer operative times and decreased sensitivity in identifying accessory spleens.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is a viable and beneficial surgical option for selected patients.
  • LS is not the preferred method for hypersplenism or traumatic splenic injury.
  • Further research may refine the indications and techniques for optimal LS outcomes.