Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in arousal and accessibility to information in memory

T M Libkuman1, J Griffith, W M Wines

  • 1Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant 48859, USA. Terry.M.Libkuman@cmich.edu

The Journal of General Psychology
|February 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Precarious but Possible: A Qualitative Study of the Landscape of Gig Work for People Living with Disabilities and Future Recommendations for Best Practices.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2025
Same author

System Dynamics Modeling of Caries Severity States in Long-Term Care.

Journal of dental research·2024
Same author

Containing a measles outbreak in Minnesota, 2017: methods and challenges.

Perspectives in public health·2019
Same author

Impact of intended and relative dose intensity of R-CHOP in a large, consecutive cohort of elderly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with curative intent: no difference in cumulative incidence of relapse comparing patients by age.

Journal of internal medicine·2019
Same author

Ensemble methods for stochastic networks with special reference to the biological clock of Neurospora crassa.

PloS one·2018
Same author

A comparative study of tracheal diameter in Caucasian and Chinese patients.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2016

This study explored how arousal levels, indicated by personality types, affect memory information access. Findings suggest arousal and personality traits do not strongly influence how semantic or physical stimuli impact memory recall.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Research
  • Personality Psychology

Background:

  • The arousal-accessibility hypothesis posits that arousal influences memory recall.
  • Previous research suggests personality types may correlate with arousal levels.
  • Understanding this link is crucial for memory and learning theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically test the arousal-accessibility hypothesis across nine experiments.
  • To investigate the interaction between personality-indexed arousal levels and stimulus type (semantic vs. physical) on memory.
  • To determine if specific personality traits predict differential sensitivity to stimulus types.

Main Methods:

  • Nine experiments were conducted using diverse memory tasks: verbal discrimination, false recognition, cued recall, and paired associates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants were categorized based on personality types (e.g., stable extraverted, neurotic introverted) to index arousal levels.
  • Stimuli were varied, including semantic and physical (graphic, phonetic) cues, during study and test phases.

    • Main Results:

    • Most experiments (1-5, 6-8) failed to support the arousal-accessibility hypothesis, showing no significant differential effects of personality types on stimulus processing.
    • Experiment 3 indicated stable extraverted individuals outperformed neurotic introverted individuals on an associative-matching task.
    • Experiment 9, a replication, found some support: extraverted participants were negatively impacted by semantic similarity, aligning partially with the hypothesis.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings provide limited support for the arousal-accessibility hypothesis.
    • Personality types, as indicators of arousal, did not consistently predict differential memory responses to semantic versus physical stimuli.
    • Further research may be needed to refine the understanding of arousal's complex role in memory accessibility.