Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Stigmatized sources and persuasion: prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny
R E Petty1, M A Fleming, P H White
1Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1222, USA. petty.1@osu.edu
Abstract:
Two experiments examined the viability of several explanations for why majority group individuals process persuasive messages from stigmatized sources more than those from nonstigmatized sources. In each study, majority group participants who either were high or low in prejudice or were high or low in ambivalence toward a stigmatized source's group were exposed to a persuasive communication attributed to a stigmatized (Black, Experiment 1; homosexual, Experiment 2) or nonstigmatized (White, Experiment 1; heterosexual, Experiment 2) source. In both studies, source stigmatization increased message scrutiny only among those who were low in prejudice toward the stigmatized group. This finding is most consistent with the view that people scrutinize messages from stigmatized sources in order to guard against possibly unfair reactions by themselves or others.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Routes of Persuasion
Persuasion Strategies
Social Proof
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

