Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Familial language impairment: more English evidence

M Gopnik1

  • 1Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal, Que., Canada. gopnik@leacock.lan.mcgill.ca

Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica : Official Organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)
|February 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Individuals with familial language impairment struggle with grammatical error correction and production, despite intact comprehension of basic grammar and narratives. They may use memory and explicit rules to compensate for underlying grammatical deficits.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Balanced environmental R&D.

Environmental science & technology·2011
Same author

Language deficits and genetic factors.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2011
Same author

Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder.

Cognition·1991
Same author

Genetic basis of grammar defect.

Nature·1990
Same author

Feature-blind grammar and dysphagia.

Nature·1990

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Familial language impairment (FLI) affects individuals across generations.
  • Understanding the specific linguistic deficits in FLI is crucial for targeted interventions.
  • Previous research suggests varied impacts of FLI on language acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specific linguistic profile of individuals with a history of familial language impairment.
  • To compare the performance of affected individuals with their unaffected relatives and external controls.
  • To determine if observed deficits align with theoretical models of grammar acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Testing subjects aged 9-22 with familial language impairment on diverse linguistic tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessing comprehension of morphological markers (e.g., plural) and narrative understanding.
  • Evaluating grammatical error recognition/correction, tense/number production, and non-canonical sentence comprehension.
  • Comparing performance against unaffected family members and external control groups.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences in plural marker comprehension or narrative understanding compared to controls.
    • Significant difficulties in recognizing/correcting grammatical errors, producing tense/number markers, and understanding non-canonical sentences.
    • Observed deficit patterns mirror cross-linguistic findings and on-line processing challenges.
    • Affected individuals demonstrate a distinct pattern of grammatical processing difficulties.

    Conclusions:

    • Data support the hypothesis of atypical grammar representation and rule construction in familial language impairment.
    • Individuals with FLI may not develop typical productive grammatical rules.
    • Compensation strategies, such as utilizing memory and explicit rules, appear to simulate grammatical competence.