Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device

D B Chaffin1, B S Stump, M A Nussbaum

  • 1Center for Ergonomics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.

Ergonomics
|February 12, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Epilepsy and Employment in Europe: A Systematic Review of Literature.

European journal of neurology·2025
Same author

A five-year review comparing 30-day mortality following intramedullary nailing versus sliding hip screw for trochanteric hip fractures.

Injury·2022
Same author

A haploid diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) genome assembly resolves 31 chromosomes and identifies a diamide resistance mutation.

Insect biochemistry and molecular biology·2021
Same author

Invasive ACTH-producing pituitary gland neoplasm secondary to MSH2 mutation.

Cancer genetics·2021
Same author

Fixation of unstable ankle fractures using a long hindfoot nail.

Injury·2018
Same author

Modeling the impact of changes in tobacco use on individual disease risks.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2018
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Short-term practice had minimal effect on reducing low-back stresses during manual lifting or with materials handling devices (MHDs). However, MHDs significantly reduced L4/L5 disc compression during lowering, despite heavier loads.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Manual lifting and lowering tasks pose significant risks for low-back injuries.
  • Materials Handling Devices (MHDs) are designed to mitigate these risks, but their learning effects and impact on biomechanical stresses require investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of short-term practice on low-back stresses during manual lifting/lowering and with two types of MHDs.
  • To compare learning rates between manual and MHD-assisted exertions.
  • To assess the effectiveness of MHDs in reducing biomechanical loads, particularly L4/L5 disc compression.

Main Methods:

  • Four participants performed 40 lift/lower exertions manually and with an articulated balance arm and pneumatic hoist (40kg load).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured low-back dynamic moments, torso muscle antagonism (EMG), and predicted L4/L5 disc compression forces.
  • Analyzed data using non-linear regressions to assess changes over trials.

    • Main Results:

    • Practice resulted in only small, mostly non-significant decreases (2-14%) in low-back stresses.
    • Learning rates for manual and MHD-assisted exertions were not significantly different.
    • MHDs significantly reduced L4/L5 compression forces during lowering, even with heavier loads.
    • Torso muscle co-contraction increased 2-4 times with MHD use compared to manual handling.

    Conclusions:

    • Short-term practice yields minimal adaptation in low-back biomechanics for these tasks.
    • MHDs are beneficial for reducing L4/L5 compression during load lowering, despite increased co-contraction.
    • Further research with more extensive practice is needed to understand learning effects.