Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Masking level differences for cochlear and brain stem lesions

W O Olsen, D Noffsinger

    The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology
    |November 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Use of TEOAE, ABR, and Acoustic Reflex Measures to Assess Auditory Function Patients With Acoustic Neuroma.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Behavioral Special Tests.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial Group.

    JAMA·2000
    Same author

    Auditory brainstem response and magnetic resonance imaging for acoustic neuromas: costs by prevalence.

    Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2000
    Same author

    Head trauma and mid-frequency hearing loss.

    American journal of audiology·2000
    Same author

    An individualized, sensitive frequency range for early detection of ototoxicity.

    Ear and hearing·1999
    Same journal

    Laryngeal Injuries Following General Endotracheal Anesthesia: A Case Series.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Clinical and Voice Outcome Differences in Vocal Cord Cysts with and Without Sulcus Vocalis: Insights From a Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Bioabsorbable Stenting in a Case of Severe Pediatric Posterior Glottic Stenosis.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Efficacy and Safety of Finafloxacin Otic Suspension, 0.3% for the Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa: Results from two Phase III Randomized Clinical Studies.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluation Of the Expression Levels Of SerpinB3/B4/B10, Interleukin-17 As Biomarkers For Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Correlation of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Rhinogram Features Beyond Simple Airway Resistance.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    See all related articles

    Masking level differences (MLD) tests reveal subtle central nervous system (CNS) disorders. While noise-induced hearing loss and Ménière's disease impact MLD, CNS lesions are detectable even with normal hearing.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Neuroscience
    • Otolaryngology

    Background:

    • Masking level differences (MLD) are sensitive to auditory processing.
    • Subtle central auditory nervous system (CNS) lesions can impact auditory function without affecting standard hearing tests.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the diagnostic utility of MLD in differentiating hearing disorders.
    • To assess MLD in individuals with normal hearing, noise-induced hearing loss, Ménière's disorder, and CNS disorders.

    Main Methods:

    • 48 subjects were tested: normal hearing, noise-induced hearing loss, Ménière's disorder, and CNS disorders.
    • MLD for 500 Hz pure tones and spondees were measured for all groups.
    • Standard pure tone and speech audiometry were also performed.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • High-frequency noise-induced hearing loss did not affect MLD for pure tones but reduced it for speech.
    • Ménière's disorder group showed decreased MLD for both pure tones and spondees.
    • CNS disorder group, despite normal hearing, exhibited smaller than normal MLD for both stimuli.

    Conclusions:

    • MLD testing is valuable for detecting subtle CNS lesions when peripheral auditory function is normal.
    • MLD may serve as a sensitive clinical tool for identifying central auditory processing deficits.
    • Findings support the use of MLD in audiological assessments for neurological conditions.