Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New developments in evaluating central auditory mechanisms

C I Berlin

    The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology
    |November 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    To Be or Not To Be An Audiologist.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    To Be or Not To Be An Audiologist.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Past is Prologue.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    Past Is Prologue.

    American journal of audiology·2015
    Same author

    OTOF mutations revealed by genetic analysis of hearing loss families including a potential temperature sensitive auditory neuropathy allele.

    Journal of medical genetics·2005
    Same author

    Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic neurosensory deafness at DFNB1 not associated with the compound-heterozygous GJB2 (connexin 26) genotype M34T/167delT.

    American journal of human genetics·2000
    Same journal

    Laryngeal Injuries Following General Endotracheal Anesthesia: A Case Series.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Clinical and Voice Outcome Differences in Vocal Cord Cysts with and Without Sulcus Vocalis: Insights From a Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Bioabsorbable Stenting in a Case of Severe Pediatric Posterior Glottic Stenosis.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Efficacy and Safety of Finafloxacin Otic Suspension, 0.3% for the Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa: Results from two Phase III Randomized Clinical Studies.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluation Of the Expression Levels Of SerpinB3/B4/B10, Interleukin-17 As Biomarkers For Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    Same journal

    Correlation of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Rhinogram Features Beyond Simple Airway Resistance.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
    See all related articles

    This review covers five key tests for evaluating the central auditory mechanism, including the Masking Level Difference (MLD) and brain stem responses. A summary chart aids in selecting the most productive diagnostic tools.

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology and Neuroscience
    • Neuroscience
    • Otolaryngology

    Background:

    • The central auditory mechanism is crucial for sound processing.
    • Accurate evaluation of auditory function requires reliable diagnostic tools.
    • Several electrophysiological and behavioral tests can assess central auditory pathways.

    Observation:

    • Five auditory tests were reviewed: Masking Level Difference (MLD), stapedius muscle reflex, electrocochleography, early brain stem responses, and dichotic listening.
    • Each test offers unique insights into different aspects of auditory processing.
    • A comparative summary highlights the common applications and strengths of each test.

    Findings:

    • The Masking Level Difference (MLD) is effective for assessing binaural hearing.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Early brain stem responses provide objective measures of the auditory pathway's integrity.
  • Dichotic listening tasks evaluate central auditory processing and hemispheric function.

    • Implications:

    • These tests collectively offer a comprehensive approach to diagnosing central auditory processing disorders.
    • Selecting the appropriate test enhances diagnostic accuracy and guides treatment strategies.
    • Understanding the specific productivity of each test optimizes clinical decision-making in audiology.