Showing results (51-60 of 497) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 50
Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery|October 22, 2011
Perspectives and opportunities for nanomedicine in the management of atherosclerosisMark E Lobatto, Valentin Fuster, Zahi A Fayad, et al.
Science Translational Medicine|June 6, 2014
Imaging and nanomedicine in inflammatory atherosclerosisWillem J M Mulder, Farouc A Jaffer, Zahi A Fayad, et al.
Atherosclerosis|June 26, 2016
Non-invasive imaging of atherosclerosis regression with magnetic resonance to guide drug developmentPaolo Raggi, Damiano Baldassarre, Simon Day, et al.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis : JTH|July 23, 2003
Integration of vascular biology and magnetic resonance imaging in the understanding of atherothrombosis and acute coronary syndromesV Fuster, R Corti, Z A Fayad, et al.
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging|April 23, 2015
Simultaneous carotid PET/MR: feasibility and improvement of magnetic resonance-based attenuation correctionJason Bini, Mootaz Eldib, Philip M Robson, et al.
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology|December 6, 2008
Nanotechnology in medical imaging: probe design and applicationsDavid P Cormode, Torjus Skajaa, Zahi A Fayad, et al.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences|January 25, 2002
New understanding of atherosclerosis (clinically and experimentally) with evolving MRI technology in vivoR Corti, V Fuster, J J Badimon, et al.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology|October 23, 2010
Nanoparticles as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents for vascular and cardiac diseasesWei Chen, David P Cormode, Zahi A Fayad, et al.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI|October 15, 2013
Registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the common carotid artery using a fixed-frame template-based squared-difference methodSarayu Ramachandran, Claudia Calcagno, Venkatesh Mani, et al.
American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging|June 13, 2015
Quantitative carotid PET/MR imaging: clinical evaluation of MR-Attenuation correction versus CT-Attenuation correction in (18)F-FDG PET/MR emission data and comparison to PET/CTJason Bini, Philip M Robson, Claudia Calcagno, et al.
Pageof 50