Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

A Tingberg

Showing results (11-20 of 24) with videos related to

Pageof 3
Sort By:
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|June 4, 2005
Using simple mathematical functions to simulate pathological structures--input for digital mammography clinical trialM Ruschin, A Tingberg, M Båth, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences|December 7, 2024
How does intelligent noise reduction software influence the image quality in pelvic digital radiography: A phantom studyE D Hussner, S Sundby, C B Outzen, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences|February 19, 2025
How does intelligent noise reduction software influence the image quality in pelvic digital radiography: ResponseE D Hussner, S Sundby, C B Outzen, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|August 21, 2007
Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantomT Svahn, B Hemdal, M Ruschin, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|June 4, 2005
Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography: a pilot studyM Ruschin, B Hemdal, I Andersson, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|January 6, 2001
The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteriaA Almén, A Tingberg, S Mattsson, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|March 16, 2010
The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance studyT Svahn, I Andersson, D Chakraborty, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|June 4, 2005
Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteriaB Hemdal, I Andersson, A Grahn, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|July 19, 2001
Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen-film radiographyM Sandborg, A Tingberg, D R Dance, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|January 25, 2002
The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteriaB Lanhede, M Båth, S Kheddache, et al.
Pageof 3

Showing results (11-20 of 24) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 3
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|June 4, 2005
Using simple mathematical functions to simulate pathological structures--input for digital mammography clinical trialM Ruschin, A Tingberg, M Båth, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences|December 7, 2024
How does intelligent noise reduction software influence the image quality in pelvic digital radiography: A phantom studyE D Hussner, S Sundby, C B Outzen, et al.
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences|February 19, 2025
How does intelligent noise reduction software influence the image quality in pelvic digital radiography: ResponseE D Hussner, S Sundby, C B Outzen, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|August 21, 2007
Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantomT Svahn, B Hemdal, M Ruschin, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|June 4, 2005
Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography: a pilot studyM Ruschin, B Hemdal, I Andersson, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|January 6, 2001
The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteriaA Almén, A Tingberg, S Mattsson, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|March 16, 2010
The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance studyT Svahn, I Andersson, D Chakraborty, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|June 4, 2005
Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteriaB Hemdal, I Andersson, A Grahn, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|July 19, 2001
Demonstration of correlations between clinical and physical image quality measures in chest and lumbar spine screen-film radiographyM Sandborg, A Tingberg, D R Dance, et al.
The British Journal of Radiology|January 25, 2002
The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteriaB Lanhede, M Båth, S Kheddache, et al.
Pageof 3