Showing results (1-10 of 10) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Journal of Medical Ethics|April 12, 2020
Why NIPT should be publicly fundedEline Maria Bunnik, Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, et al.
Bioethics|July 5, 2020
Rethinking counselling in prenatal screening: An ethical analysis of informed consent in the context of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Inez D de Beaufort, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|September 19, 2019
Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal accessEline M Bunnik, Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|April 27, 2018
Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of 'routinisation' in prenatal screeningAdriana Kater-Kuipers, Inez D de Beaufort, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, et al.
Journal of Genetic Counseling|September 14, 2016
What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?Rachèl V van Schendel, Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Elsbeth H van Vliet-Lachotzki, et al.
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases|June 2, 2023
A qualitative study on the perspectives of mothers who had been diagnosed with primary carnitine deficiency through newborn screening of their childLieke M van den Heuvel, Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Tessa van Dijk, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics : EJHG|August 8, 2020
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): societal pressure or freedom of choice? A vignette study of Dutch citizens' attitudesAdriana Kater-Kuipers, Iris M Bakkeren, Sam R Riedijk, et al.
Plos One|August 18, 2022
Parents' views on accepting, declining, and expanding newborn bloodspot screeningSylvia M van der Pal, Sophie Wins, Jasmijn E Klapwijk, et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics : EJHG|August 13, 2021
Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women's perspectivesKaruna R M van der Meij, Annabel Njio, Linda Martin, et al.
Pageof 1