Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (41-50 of 57) with videos related to
Page
of 6
Sort By:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|
November 9, 2017
Human relevance of rodent liver tumors: Key insights from a Toxicology Forum workshop on nongenotoxic modes of action
Susan P Felter, Jennifer E Foreman, Alan Boobis, et al.
Toxicology Letters
|
April 27, 2021
Corrigendum to "Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology"
Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, Bas Blaauboer, et al.
Toxicology Letters
|
January 7, 2021
Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: Not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology
Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, Bas Blaauboer, et al.
Chemico-Biological Interactions
|
May 7, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Toxicology Letters
|
May 4, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Toxicology in Vitro : an International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA
|
May 4, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Environment International
|
July 13, 2020
Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER)
Paul Whaley, Elisa Aiassa, Claire Beausoleil, et al.
Toxicology in Vitro : an International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA
|
April 8, 2019
A mode-of-action ontology model for safety evaluation of chemicals: Outcome of a series of workshops on repeated dose toxicity
Bertrand Desprez, Barbara Birk, Bas Blaauboer, et al.
Food and Chemical Toxicology : an International Journal Published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association
|
May 4, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology
|
May 12, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Page
of 6
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (41-50 of 57) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 6
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|
November 9, 2017
Human relevance of rodent liver tumors: Key insights from a Toxicology Forum workshop on nongenotoxic modes of action
Susan P Felter, Jennifer E Foreman, Alan Boobis, et al.
Toxicology Letters
|
April 27, 2021
Corrigendum to "Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology"
Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, Bas Blaauboer, et al.
Toxicology Letters
|
January 7, 2021
Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: Not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology
Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, Bas Blaauboer, et al.
Chemico-Biological Interactions
|
May 7, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Toxicology Letters
|
May 4, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Toxicology in Vitro : an International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA
|
May 4, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Environment International
|
July 13, 2020
Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER)
Paul Whaley, Elisa Aiassa, Claire Beausoleil, et al.
Toxicology in Vitro : an International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA
|
April 8, 2019
A mode-of-action ontology model for safety evaluation of chemicals: Outcome of a series of workshops on repeated dose toxicity
Bertrand Desprez, Barbara Birk, Bas Blaauboer, et al.
Food and Chemical Toxicology : an International Journal Published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association
|
May 4, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology
|
May 12, 2020
Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?
Herman Autrup, Frank A Barile, Sir Colin Berry, et al.
Page
of 6