Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (71-80 of 78) with videos related to
Page
of 8
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.
This site can display upto 78 results.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|
March 18, 2014
Perception problems of the verbal scale
Carrie Mullen, Danielle Spence, Linda Moxey, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|
December 6, 2011
Response to Aitken et al. on R v T
David Faigman, Allan Jamieson, Carla Noziglia, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|
December 16, 2014
Regarding Champod, editorial: "Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science"
D Michael Risinger, William C Thompson, Allan Jamieson, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|
April 24, 2010
Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809
Dan E Krane, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|
July 22, 2008
Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation
Dan E Krane, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|
February 24, 2011
Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor--aa rejection of "working blind" as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663
William C Thompson, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Forensic Science International
|
November 8, 2016
A comment on the PCAST report: Skip the "match"/"non-match" stage
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, David H Kaye, David J Balding, et al.
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
|
August 31, 2017
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims
Michael J Saks, Thomas Albright, Thomas L Bohan, et al.
Page
of 8
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (71-80 of 78) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 8
You have reached the last page of results.
This site can display upto 78 results.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|
March 18, 2014
Perception problems of the verbal scale
Carrie Mullen, Danielle Spence, Linda Moxey, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|
December 6, 2011
Response to Aitken et al. on R v T
David Faigman, Allan Jamieson, Carla Noziglia, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|
December 16, 2014
Regarding Champod, editorial: "Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science"
D Michael Risinger, William C Thompson, Allan Jamieson, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|
April 24, 2010
Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809
Dan E Krane, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|
July 22, 2008
Sequential unmasking: a means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation
Dan E Krane, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|
February 24, 2011
Commentary on: Thornton JI. Letter to the editor--aa rejection of "working blind" as a cure for contextual bias. J Forensic Sci 2010;55(6):1663
William C Thompson, Simon Ford, Jason R Gilder, et al.
Forensic Science International
|
November 8, 2016
A comment on the PCAST report: Skip the "match"/"non-match" stage
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, David H Kaye, David J Balding, et al.
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
|
August 31, 2017
Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims
Michael J Saks, Thomas Albright, Thomas L Bohan, et al.
Page
of 8