Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Alonso Carrasco-Labra

Showing results (81-90 of 152) with videos related to

Pageof 16
Sort By:
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|September 26, 2018
GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networksRomina Brignardello-Petersen, M Hassan Murad, Stephen D Walter, et al.
Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica = Pan American Journal of Public Health|June 15, 2017
[Clinical practice guidelines: qualitative study of their implementation in the Chilean health system]Paloma Herrera, Valentina Fajreldin, María Francisca Rodríguez, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|January 29, 2022
Minimal important changes in standard deviation units are highly variable and no universally applicable value can be determinedYasushi Tsujimoto, Tomoko Fujii, Yusuke Tsutsumi, et al.
BMJ Open|January 25, 2018
Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trialJuan José Yepes-Nuñez, Rebecca L Morgan, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|January 22, 2016
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is neededMiranda Langendam, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Nancy Santesso, et al.
BMJ Open|February 22, 2019
Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a <i>BMJ</i> Rapid RecommendationQiukui Hao, Tahira Devji, Dena Zeraatkar, et al.
BMC Oral Health|June 27, 2024
Evidence-informed guidelines in oral health: insights from a systematic surveyFrancisca Verdugo-Paiva, Ana María Rojas-Gómez, Vicente Wielandt, et al.
BMJ Open|October 3, 2015
Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocolBradley C Johnston, Shanil Ebrahim, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, et al.
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)|June 2, 2026
Light-based adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders: An evidence summary of a living systematic review, Version 2026 1.0Olivia Urquhart, Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, Carolina Martins-Pfeifer, et al.
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)|March 4, 2026
Cytology adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders: An evidence summary of a living systematic review, Version 2026 1.0Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, Carolina Martins-Pfeifer, Ankita Shashikant Bhosale, et al.
Pageof 16

Showing results (81-90 of 152) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 16
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|September 26, 2018
GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networksRomina Brignardello-Petersen, M Hassan Murad, Stephen D Walter, et al.
Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica = Pan American Journal of Public Health|June 15, 2017
[Clinical practice guidelines: qualitative study of their implementation in the Chilean health system]Paloma Herrera, Valentina Fajreldin, María Francisca Rodríguez, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|January 29, 2022
Minimal important changes in standard deviation units are highly variable and no universally applicable value can be determinedYasushi Tsujimoto, Tomoko Fujii, Yusuke Tsutsumi, et al.
BMJ Open|January 25, 2018
Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trialJuan José Yepes-Nuñez, Rebecca L Morgan, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|January 22, 2016
Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is neededMiranda Langendam, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Nancy Santesso, et al.
BMJ Open|February 22, 2019
Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a <i>BMJ</i> Rapid RecommendationQiukui Hao, Tahira Devji, Dena Zeraatkar, et al.
BMC Oral Health|June 27, 2024
Evidence-informed guidelines in oral health: insights from a systematic surveyFrancisca Verdugo-Paiva, Ana María Rojas-Gómez, Vicente Wielandt, et al.
BMJ Open|October 3, 2015
Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocolBradley C Johnston, Shanil Ebrahim, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, et al.
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)|June 2, 2026
Light-based adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders: An evidence summary of a living systematic review, Version 2026 1.0Olivia Urquhart, Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, Carolina Martins-Pfeifer, et al.
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)|March 4, 2026
Cytology adjuncts to determine the need for biopsy for early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant disorders: An evidence summary of a living systematic review, Version 2026 1.0Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, Carolina Martins-Pfeifer, Ankita Shashikant Bhosale, et al.
Pageof 16