Showing results (51-60 of 62) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 7
BMJ Open|February 21, 2019
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence: protocol for the OPAL randomised trialSuzanne Hagen, Doreen McClurg, Carol Bugge, et al.BMJ Open|February 28, 2020
Game of Stones: feasibility randomised controlled trial of how to engage men with obesity in text message and incentive interventions for weight lossStephan U Dombrowski, Matthew McDonald, Marjon van der Pol, et al.Trials|October 9, 2020
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of vaginal pessary self-management compared to clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse: protocol for the TOPSY randomised controlled trialSuzanne Hagen, Rohna Kearney, Kirsteen Goodman, et al.Trials|July 22, 2022
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text messages with or without endowment incentives for weight management in men with obesity (Game of Stones): study protocol for a randomised controlled trialLisa Macaulay, Catriona O'Dolan, Alison Avenell, et al.Eclinicalmedicine|December 11, 2023
Clinical effectiveness of vaginal pessary self-management vs clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse (TOPSY): a randomised controlled superiority trialSuzanne Hagen, Rohna Kearney, Kirsteen Goodman, et al.Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|May 20, 2024
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management versus clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse in women: the TOPSY RCT with process evaluationCarol Bugge, Suzanne Hagen, Andrew Elders, et al.The New England Journal of Medicine|September 5, 2019
Five-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial of Treatments for Varicose VeinsJulie Brittenden, David Cooper, Maria Dimitrova, et al.BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology|August 20, 2025
Four Year Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Vaginal Pessary Self-Management Versus Clinic-Based Care for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (TOPSY): Long Term Follow-Up of a Randomised Controlled Superiority TrialCarol Bugge, Rohna Kearney, Catherine Best, et al.Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|April 11, 2015
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation and surgery for varicose veins: results from the Comparison of LAser, Surgery and foam Sclerotherapy (CLASS) randomised controlled trialJulie Brittenden, Seonaidh C Cotton, Andrew Elders, et al.Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England)|December 8, 2020
Basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for women with urinary incontinence: the OPAL RCTSuzanne Hagen, Carol Bugge, Sarah G Dean, et al.Pageof 7