Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Andrew Gelman

Showing results (1-10 of 95) with videos related to

Pageof 10
Sort By:
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|May 9, 2019
Don't characterize replications as successes or failuresAndrew Gelman
Annals of Surgery|July 12, 2018
Don't Calculate Post-hoc Power Using Observed Estimate of Effect SizeAndrew Gelman
Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science|August 14, 2025
Letter to the EditorAndrew Gelman
Social Science & Medicine (1982)|May 12, 2018
Benefits and limitations of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and CartwrightAndrew Gelman
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)|December 13, 2012
P values and statistical practiceAndrew Gelman
Journal of Econometrics|October 23, 2023
What is a standard error?Andrew Gelman
Statistics in Medicine|October 26, 2007
Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviationsAndrew Gelman
Annals of Surgery|October 27, 2018
Comment on "Post-hoc Power Using Observed Estimate of Effect Size is too Noisy to be Useful"Andrew Gelman
Nature|October 30, 2024
Why forecast an election that's too close to call?Andrew Gelman
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin|September 16, 2017
The Failure of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing When Studying Incremental Changes, and What to Do About ItAndrew Gelman
Pageof 10

Showing results (1-10 of 95) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 10
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences|May 9, 2019
Don't characterize replications as successes or failuresAndrew Gelman
Annals of Surgery|July 12, 2018
Don't Calculate Post-hoc Power Using Observed Estimate of Effect SizeAndrew Gelman
Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science|August 14, 2025
Letter to the EditorAndrew Gelman
Social Science & Medicine (1982)|May 12, 2018
Benefits and limitations of randomized controlled trials: A commentary on Deaton and CartwrightAndrew Gelman
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)|December 13, 2012
P values and statistical practiceAndrew Gelman
Journal of Econometrics|October 23, 2023
What is a standard error?Andrew Gelman
Statistics in Medicine|October 26, 2007
Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviationsAndrew Gelman
Annals of Surgery|October 27, 2018
Comment on "Post-hoc Power Using Observed Estimate of Effect Size is too Noisy to be Useful"Andrew Gelman
Nature|October 30, 2024
Why forecast an election that's too close to call?Andrew Gelman
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin|September 16, 2017
The Failure of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing When Studying Incremental Changes, and What to Do About ItAndrew Gelman
Pageof 10