Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Andrew van Es

Showing results (1-10 of 2) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|April 30, 2017
Implementation and assessment of a likelihood ratio approach for the evaluation of LA-ICP-MS evidence in forensic glass analysisAndrew van Es, Wim Wiarda, Maarten Hordijk, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|December 5, 2016
Numerical likelihood ratios outputted by LR systems are often based on extrapolation: When to stop extrapolating?Peter Vergeer, Andrew van Es, Arent de Jongh, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 2) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|April 30, 2017
Implementation and assessment of a likelihood ratio approach for the evaluation of LA-ICP-MS evidence in forensic glass analysisAndrew van Es, Wim Wiarda, Maarten Hordijk, et al.
Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society|December 5, 2016
Numerical likelihood ratios outputted by LR systems are often based on extrapolation: When to stop extrapolating?Peter Vergeer, Andrew van Es, Arent de Jongh, et al.
Pageof 1