Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Anne M Dijkstra

Showing results (1-10 of 7) with videos related to

Pageof 1
Sort By:
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|January 22, 2015
Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate: A review studyAnne M Dijkstra, Mirjam Schuijff
Science and Engineering Ethics|December 18, 2019
Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A ReviewMirjam Schuijff, Anne M Dijkstra
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|May 10, 2014
Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualisedAnne M Dijkstra, Christine R Critchley
Plos One|June 18, 2024
Quality of science journalism in the age of Artificial Intelligence explored with a mixed methodologyAnne M Dijkstra, Anouk de Jong, Marco Boscolo
BMC Medical Ethics|April 27, 2021
A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the NetherlandsMirjam Schuijff, Menno D T De Jong, Anne M Dijkstra
Npj Urban Sustainability|January 26, 2026
Whose city is it? Mapping perceived urban livability with citizen-guided AIFlorencio Campomanes V, Angela Abascal, Lorraine Trento Oliveira, et al.
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|October 9, 2012
Public participation in genomics research in the Netherlands: validating a measurement scaleAnne M Dijkstra, Jan M Gutteling, J A A Swart, et al.
Pageof 1

Showing results (1-10 of 7) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 1
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|January 22, 2015
Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate: A review studyAnne M Dijkstra, Mirjam Schuijff
Science and Engineering Ethics|December 18, 2019
Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A ReviewMirjam Schuijff, Anne M Dijkstra
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|May 10, 2014
Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualisedAnne M Dijkstra, Christine R Critchley
Plos One|June 18, 2024
Quality of science journalism in the age of Artificial Intelligence explored with a mixed methodologyAnne M Dijkstra, Anouk de Jong, Marco Boscolo
BMC Medical Ethics|April 27, 2021
A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the NetherlandsMirjam Schuijff, Menno D T De Jong, Anne M Dijkstra
Npj Urban Sustainability|January 26, 2026
Whose city is it? Mapping perceived urban livability with citizen-guided AIFlorencio Campomanes V, Angela Abascal, Lorraine Trento Oliveira, et al.
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|October 9, 2012
Public participation in genomics research in the Netherlands: validating a measurement scaleAnne M Dijkstra, Jan M Gutteling, J A A Swart, et al.
Pageof 1