Showing results (341-350 of 413) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 42
Anticancer Research|November 1, 1993
Prognostic significance of estrogen receptor expression in ovarian cancer. Immunoreactive Score (IRS) vs. Composition Adjusted Receptor Level (CARL)D G Kieback, M F Press, E N Atkinson, et al.Clinical Epigenetics|November 12, 2020
Triage of hrHPV-positive women: comparison of two commercial methylation-specific PCR assaysCarolin Dippmann, Martina Schmitz, Kristina Wunsch, et al.Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer|October 22, 2019
Combined assessment of 3q26 amplification and promoter methylation in patients with high grade cervical lesions show age specific differencesJosefine Beiersdorf, Cornelia Scheungraber, Kristina Wunsch, et al.Cancer Genetics|January 31, 2012
Two novel unbalanced whole arm translocations are frequently detected in cervical squamous cell carcinomaClaudia Backsch, Birgit Pauly, Melanie Liesenfeld, et al.Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde|April 1, 1995
[Prognostic differentiation of ovarian carcinomas by immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor expression]D G Kieback, M F Press, S K McCamant, et al.Breast Cancer Research and Treatment|January 21, 2010
The contralateral synchronous breast carcinoma: a comparison of histology, localization, and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics with the primary index cancerDiane M Renz, Joachim Böttcher, Pascal A T Baltzer, et al.Cancer Gene Therapy|June 26, 2002
A phase I/II trial of rAd/p53 (SCH 58500) gene replacement in recurrent ovarian cancerRichard E Buller, Ingo B Runnebaum, Beth Y Karlan, et al.American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A|May 25, 2013
Cardiac fat-containing lesions are common in tuberous sclerosis complexElias A Shaaya, Jacqueline S Hirshberg, Olivia T Rabe, et al.Cancer Gene Therapy|June 26, 2002
Long term follow-up of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after Ad p53 gene replacement with SCH 58500Richard E Buller, Mark S Shahin, Jo Ann Horowitz, et al.Rofo : Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiete Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Nuklearmedizin|October 16, 2008
[Clinical value of computer-assisted analysis in MR mammography. A comparison between two systems and three observers with different levels of experience]D M Renz, P A T Baltzer, P E Kullnig, et al.Pageof 42