Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Brian L Sprague

Showing results (131-140 of 223) with videos related to

Pageof 23
Sort By:
JAMA Network Open|March 25, 2022
Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital MammographyThao-Quyen H Ho, Michael C S Bissell, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|October 28, 2023
Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast densityKarla Kerlikowske, Weiwei Zhu, Yu-Ru Su, et al.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis : JTH|June 11, 2026
Development and Validation of a Risk Assessment Model for Hospital-Acquired Venous Thrombosis in Medical Inpatients with CancerKarlyn A Martin, Katherine Wilkinson, Andrew Sparks, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|May 29, 2013
Circulating serum xenoestrogens and mammographic breast densityBrian L Sprague, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Curtis J Hedman, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|June 7, 2023
Impact of BMI on Prevalence of Dense Breasts by Race and EthnicityKarla Kerlikowske, Michael C S Bissell, Brian L Sprague, et al.
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR|April 11, 2025
Diagnostic management pathways for workup of abnormal screening with digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesisLouise M Henderson, Weiwei Zhu, Tracy Onega, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|November 22, 2021
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Beyond Age 75 Years : A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisJohn T Schousboe, Brian L Sprague, Linn Abraham, et al.
Radiology|October 29, 2014
Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breastsChristoph I Lee, Mucahit Cevik, Oguzhan Alagoz, et al.
Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making|March 20, 2018
Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer ModelingJeanne S Mandelblatt, Aimee M Near, Diana L Miglioretti, et al.
Journal of Women'S Health (2002)|February 9, 2017
Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF GuidelineKaren J Wernli, Robert F Arao, Rebecca A Hubbard, et al.
Pageof 23

Showing results (131-140 of 223) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 23
JAMA Network Open|March 25, 2022
Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital MammographyThao-Quyen H Ho, Michael C S Bissell, Karla Kerlikowske, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute|October 28, 2023
Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast densityKarla Kerlikowske, Weiwei Zhu, Yu-Ru Su, et al.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis : JTH|June 11, 2026
Development and Validation of a Risk Assessment Model for Hospital-Acquired Venous Thrombosis in Medical Inpatients with CancerKarlyn A Martin, Katherine Wilkinson, Andrew Sparks, et al.
Breast Cancer Research : BCR|May 29, 2013
Circulating serum xenoestrogens and mammographic breast densityBrian L Sprague, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Curtis J Hedman, et al.
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention : a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology|June 7, 2023
Impact of BMI on Prevalence of Dense Breasts by Race and EthnicityKarla Kerlikowske, Michael C S Bissell, Brian L Sprague, et al.
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR|April 11, 2025
Diagnostic management pathways for workup of abnormal screening with digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesisLouise M Henderson, Weiwei Zhu, Tracy Onega, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|November 22, 2021
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Beyond Age 75 Years : A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisJohn T Schousboe, Brian L Sprague, Linn Abraham, et al.
Radiology|October 29, 2014
Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breastsChristoph I Lee, Mucahit Cevik, Oguzhan Alagoz, et al.
Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making|March 20, 2018
Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer ModelingJeanne S Mandelblatt, Aimee M Near, Diana L Miglioretti, et al.
Journal of Women'S Health (2002)|February 9, 2017
Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF GuidelineKaren J Wernli, Robert F Arao, Rebecca A Hubbard, et al.
Pageof 23