Showing results (1-10 of 49) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine|March 25, 2017
Arthroplasty registries around the world: valuable sources of hip implant revision risk dataRichard E Hughes, Aditi Batra, Brian R Hallstrom
Arthroplasty Today|August 2, 2021
Time for an Update? A Look at Current Guidelines for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Hip FractureStefano R Muscatelli, Michael A Charters, Brian R Hallstrom
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering|April 18, 2013
Surgeon variability in total knee arthroplasty component alignment: a Monte Carlo analysisChristopher J Gatti, Brian R Hallstrom, Richard E Hughes
The Journal of Arthroplasty|September 28, 2025
Similar Revision Rates for High- and Low-Viscosity Cement in Total Knee ArthroplastyEric R Cornish, Huiyong Zheng, Creg Carpenter, et al.
Arthroplasty Today|June 2, 2023
Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Implant Revision Risk to 5 Years From a State-wide Arthroplasty Registry in MichiganRichard E Hughes, Huiyong Zheng, Tae Kim, et al.
Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology|March 8, 2018
Application of a Causal Discovery Algorithm to the Analysis of Arthroplasty Registry DataCamden Cheek, Huiyong Zheng, Brian R Hallstrom, et al.
Arthroplasty Today|June 6, 2022
Limiting the Surveillance Period to 90 Days Misses a Large Portion of Infections in the First Year After Total Hip and Knee ArthroplastyStefano Muscatelli, Huiyong Zheng, Aditya Muralidharan, et al.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume|June 4, 2024
Individualized Surgeon Reports in a Statewide Registry: A Pathway to Improved OutcomesJ Wesley Mesko, Huiyong Zheng, Richard E Hughes, et al.
Orthopedic Research and Reviews|December 2, 2021
Early Benchmarking Total Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI)Heather A Chubb, Eric R Cornish, Brian R Hallstrom, et al.
Pageof 5