Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Cory E Goldstein

Showing results (11-20 of 38) with videos related to

Pageof 4
Sort By:
Journal of Medical Ethics|December 18, 2024
Navigating the consent river: questions to consider before waiving consent requirements in pragmatic cluster randomised trialsCory E Goldstein, Monica Taljaard, Stephanie N Dixon, et al.
Clinical Trials (London, England)|December 11, 2019
Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical reviewKarla Hemming, Monica Taljaard, Tom Marshall, et al.
Clinical Trials (London, England)|May 21, 2020
ResponseKarla Hemming, Cory E Goldstein, Tom Marshall, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|June 16, 2017
Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials?Marion K Campbell, Charles Weijer, Cory E Goldstein, et al.
Clinical Trials (London, England)|March 15, 2026
Reconsidering registration requirements for trials randomising health care providersKarla Hemming, Monica Taljaard, Laura Kudrna, et al.
BMJ Open|September 28, 2021
Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexedHayden P Nix, Charles Weijer, Jamie C Brehaut, et al.
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal|April 10, 2018
An Ethical Analysis of the SUPPORT Trial: Addressing Challenges Posed by a Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Controlled TrialAustin R Horn, Charles Weijer, Jeremy Grimshaw, et al.
BMC Medical Ethics|February 28, 2018
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentationCory E Goldstein, Charles Weijer, Jamie C Brehaut, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|June 14, 2019
Ethical issues raised by cluster randomised trials conducted in low-resource settings: identifying gaps in the <i>Ottawa Statement</i> through an analysis of the PURE Malawi trialTiwonge K Mtande, Charles Weijer, Mina C Hosseinipour, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|April 29, 2018
Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providersAustin R Horn, Charles Weijer, Spencer Phillips Hey, et al.
Pageof 4

Showing results (11-20 of 38) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 4
Journal of Medical Ethics|December 18, 2024
Navigating the consent river: questions to consider before waiving consent requirements in pragmatic cluster randomised trialsCory E Goldstein, Monica Taljaard, Stephanie N Dixon, et al.
Clinical Trials (London, England)|December 11, 2019
Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical reviewKarla Hemming, Monica Taljaard, Tom Marshall, et al.
Clinical Trials (London, England)|May 21, 2020
ResponseKarla Hemming, Cory E Goldstein, Tom Marshall, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|June 16, 2017
Do doctors have a duty to take part in pragmatic randomised trials?Marion K Campbell, Charles Weijer, Cory E Goldstein, et al.
Clinical Trials (London, England)|March 15, 2026
Reconsidering registration requirements for trials randomising health care providersKarla Hemming, Monica Taljaard, Laura Kudrna, et al.
BMJ Open|September 28, 2021
Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexedHayden P Nix, Charles Weijer, Jamie C Brehaut, et al.
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal|April 10, 2018
An Ethical Analysis of the SUPPORT Trial: Addressing Challenges Posed by a Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Controlled TrialAustin R Horn, Charles Weijer, Jeremy Grimshaw, et al.
BMC Medical Ethics|February 28, 2018
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentationCory E Goldstein, Charles Weijer, Jamie C Brehaut, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|June 14, 2019
Ethical issues raised by cluster randomised trials conducted in low-resource settings: identifying gaps in the <i>Ottawa Statement</i> through an analysis of the PURE Malawi trialTiwonge K Mtande, Charles Weijer, Mina C Hosseinipour, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|April 29, 2018
Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providersAustin R Horn, Charles Weijer, Spencer Phillips Hey, et al.
Pageof 4