Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Daniel A Krauss

Showing results (1-10 of 17) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|September 24, 2004
Adjusting risk of recidivism: do judicial departures worsen or improve recidivism prediction under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?Daniel A Krauss
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry|March 15, 2006
Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history scoreDaniel A Krauss
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|April 25, 2013
Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practiceDaniel A Krauss, Nicholas Scurich
Law and Human Behavior|July 20, 2023
Risk assessment of child-pornography-exclusive offendersNicholas Scurich, Daniel A Krauss
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|July 19, 2011
The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sampleJohn G McCabe, Daniel A Krauss
Assessment|August 12, 2009
Contemplating the presence of third party observers and facilitators in psychological evaluationsRandy K Otto, Daniel A Krauss
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry|May 22, 2016
The biasing effect of the "sexually violent predator" label on legal decisionsNicholas Scurich, Jennifer Gongola, Daniel A Krauss
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|November 30, 2004
The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty casesDaniel A Krauss, Joel D Lieberman, Jodi Olson
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry|August 30, 2005
The effects of judicial admonitions on hearsay evidenceDae Ho Lee, Daniel A Krauss, Joel Lieberman
The American Psychologist|October 6, 2025
Citation accuracy, misinformation, and harmless error in American Psychological Association amicus curiae briefs: Commentary on Marcus et al. (2025)Joel A Dvoskin, Daniel A Krauss, David DeMatteo
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 17) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|September 24, 2004
Adjusting risk of recidivism: do judicial departures worsen or improve recidivism prediction under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?Daniel A Krauss
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry|March 15, 2006
Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history scoreDaniel A Krauss
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|April 25, 2013
Risk assessment in the law: legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practiceDaniel A Krauss, Nicholas Scurich
Law and Human Behavior|July 20, 2023
Risk assessment of child-pornography-exclusive offendersNicholas Scurich, Daniel A Krauss
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|July 19, 2011
The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sampleJohn G McCabe, Daniel A Krauss
Assessment|August 12, 2009
Contemplating the presence of third party observers and facilitators in psychological evaluationsRandy K Otto, Daniel A Krauss
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry|May 22, 2016
The biasing effect of the "sexually violent predator" label on legal decisionsNicholas Scurich, Jennifer Gongola, Daniel A Krauss
Behavioral Sciences & the Law|November 30, 2004
The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty casesDaniel A Krauss, Joel D Lieberman, Jodi Olson
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry|August 30, 2005
The effects of judicial admonitions on hearsay evidenceDae Ho Lee, Daniel A Krauss, Joel Lieberman
The American Psychologist|October 6, 2025
Citation accuracy, misinformation, and harmless error in American Psychological Association amicus curiae briefs: Commentary on Marcus et al. (2025)Joel A Dvoskin, Daniel A Krauss, David DeMatteo
Pageof 2