Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Daniel A Lidar

Showing results (31-40 of 42) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
Physical Review Letters|December 20, 2003
Magnetic resonance realization of decoherence-free quantum computationJason E Ollerenshaw, Daniel A Lidar, Lewis E Kay
Physical Review Letters|December 15, 2018
Demonstration of Fidelity Improvement Using Dynamical Decoupling with Superconducting QubitsBibek Pokharel, Namit Anand, Benjamin Fortman, et al.
NPJ Quantum Information|April 14, 2018
Quantum annealing versus classical machine learning applied to a simplified computational biology problemRichard Y Li, Rosa Di Felice, Remo Rohs, et al.
Nature Communications|July 2, 2013
Experimental signature of programmable quantum annealingSergio Boixo, Tameem Albash, Federico M Spedalieri, et al.
Physical Review Letters|January 15, 2011
High fidelity quantum gates via dynamical decouplingJacob R West, Daniel A Lidar, Bryan H Fong, et al.
Nature Communications|February 27, 2026
Demonstration of high-fidelity entangled logical qubits using transmonsArian Vezvaee, Vinay Tripathi, Mario Morford-Oberst, et al.
Physical Review Letters|February 21, 2025
Qudit Dynamical Decoupling on a Superconducting Quantum ProcessorVinay Tripathi, Noah Goss, Arian Vezvaee, et al.
Nature Communications|April 29, 2025
Beating the Ramsey limit on sensing with deterministic qubit controlM O Hecht, Kumar Saurav, Evangelos Vlachos, et al.
Chemical Reviews|May 5, 2025
Benchmarking Quantum Gates and CircuitsVinay Tripathi, Daria Kowsari, Kumar Saurav, et al.
Science (New York, N.Y.)|July 26, 2014
Quantum computing. Defining and detecting quantum speedupTroels F Rønnow, Zhihui Wang, Joshua Job, et al.
Pageof 5

Showing results (31-40 of 42) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Physical Review Letters|December 20, 2003
Magnetic resonance realization of decoherence-free quantum computationJason E Ollerenshaw, Daniel A Lidar, Lewis E Kay
Physical Review Letters|December 15, 2018
Demonstration of Fidelity Improvement Using Dynamical Decoupling with Superconducting QubitsBibek Pokharel, Namit Anand, Benjamin Fortman, et al.
NPJ Quantum Information|April 14, 2018
Quantum annealing versus classical machine learning applied to a simplified computational biology problemRichard Y Li, Rosa Di Felice, Remo Rohs, et al.
Nature Communications|July 2, 2013
Experimental signature of programmable quantum annealingSergio Boixo, Tameem Albash, Federico M Spedalieri, et al.
Physical Review Letters|January 15, 2011
High fidelity quantum gates via dynamical decouplingJacob R West, Daniel A Lidar, Bryan H Fong, et al.
Nature Communications|February 27, 2026
Demonstration of high-fidelity entangled logical qubits using transmonsArian Vezvaee, Vinay Tripathi, Mario Morford-Oberst, et al.
Physical Review Letters|February 21, 2025
Qudit Dynamical Decoupling on a Superconducting Quantum ProcessorVinay Tripathi, Noah Goss, Arian Vezvaee, et al.
Nature Communications|April 29, 2025
Beating the Ramsey limit on sensing with deterministic qubit controlM O Hecht, Kumar Saurav, Evangelos Vlachos, et al.
Chemical Reviews|May 5, 2025
Benchmarking Quantum Gates and CircuitsVinay Tripathi, Daria Kowsari, Kumar Saurav, et al.
Science (New York, N.Y.)|July 26, 2014
Quantum computing. Defining and detecting quantum speedupTroels F Rønnow, Zhihui Wang, Joshua Job, et al.
Pageof 5