Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Daniele Fanelli

Showing results (1-10 of 41) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
Nature|March 25, 2016
Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errorsDaniele Fanelli
Plos One|April 28, 2010
Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States DataDaniele Fanelli
Royal Society Open Science|June 12, 2019
A theory and methodology to quantify knowledgeDaniele Fanelli
Plos One|May 30, 2009
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey dataDaniele Fanelli
Nature|May 3, 2014
Publishing: Rise in retractions is a signal of integrityDaniele Fanelli
Nature|February 15, 2013
Redefine misconduct as distorted reportingDaniele Fanelli
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|March 14, 2018
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?Daniele Fanelli
Addiction (Abingdon, England)|December 18, 2014
We need more research on causes and consequences, as well as on solutionsDaniele Fanelli
Plos One|April 13, 2010
"Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the SciencesDaniele Fanelli
Plos Medicine|December 7, 2013
Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good signDaniele Fanelli
Pageof 5

Showing results (1-10 of 41) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Nature|March 25, 2016
Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errorsDaniele Fanelli
Plos One|April 28, 2010
Do pressures to publish increase scientists' bias? An empirical support from US States DataDaniele Fanelli
Royal Society Open Science|June 12, 2019
A theory and methodology to quantify knowledgeDaniele Fanelli
Plos One|May 30, 2009
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey dataDaniele Fanelli
Nature|May 3, 2014
Publishing: Rise in retractions is a signal of integrityDaniele Fanelli
Nature|February 15, 2013
Redefine misconduct as distorted reportingDaniele Fanelli
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|March 14, 2018
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?Daniele Fanelli
Addiction (Abingdon, England)|December 18, 2014
We need more research on causes and consequences, as well as on solutionsDaniele Fanelli
Plos One|April 13, 2010
"Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the SciencesDaniele Fanelli
Plos Medicine|December 7, 2013
Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good signDaniele Fanelli
Pageof 5