Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Danielle Pollock

Showing results (61-70 of 89) with videos related to

Pageof 9
Sort By:
Research Synthesis Methods|January 6, 2023
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey-based cross-sectional study of evidence synthesis expertsTimothy H Barker, Danielle Pollock, Jennifer C Stone, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|December 26, 2022
The Dark Side of Rapid Reviews: A Retreat From Systematic Approaches and the Need for Clear Expectations and ReportingZachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis|August 2, 2022
Investigating different typologies for the synthesis of evidence: a scoping review protocolZachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Carrie Price, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis|January 20, 2025
Methods for data extraction and data transformation in convergent integrated mixed methods systematic reviewsLucylynn Lizarondo, Cindy Stern, Susan Salmond, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|September 30, 2022
The role of scoping reviews in reducing research wasteHanan Khalil, Micah D J Peters, Patricia A McInerney, et al.
Research Synthesis Methods|December 4, 2023
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive studyDanielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer C Stone, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 22, 2026
Top 20 research priorities on methods of co-production in evidence synthesisDominic Ledinger, Alex Todhunter-Brown, Maureen Smith, et al.
Campbell Systematic Reviews|October 17, 2024
Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic reviewLyubov Lytvyn, Jennifer Petkovic, Joanne Khabsa, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 24, 2024
An international modified Delphi process supported updating the web-based "right review" toolBarbara Clyne, Melissa K Sharp, Michelle O' Neill, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety|May 24, 2024
What do clinical practice guidelines say about deprescribing? A scoping reviewAili Veronica Langford, Imaan Warriach, Aisling M McEvoy, et al.
Pageof 9

Showing results (61-70 of 89) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 9
Research Synthesis Methods|January 6, 2023
How should we handle predatory journals in evidence synthesis? A descriptive survey-based cross-sectional study of evidence synthesis expertsTimothy H Barker, Danielle Pollock, Jennifer C Stone, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|December 26, 2022
The Dark Side of Rapid Reviews: A Retreat From Systematic Approaches and the Need for Clear Expectations and ReportingZachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis|August 2, 2022
Investigating different typologies for the synthesis of evidence: a scoping review protocolZachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Carrie Price, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis|January 20, 2025
Methods for data extraction and data transformation in convergent integrated mixed methods systematic reviewsLucylynn Lizarondo, Cindy Stern, Susan Salmond, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|September 30, 2022
The role of scoping reviews in reducing research wasteHanan Khalil, Micah D J Peters, Patricia A McInerney, et al.
Research Synthesis Methods|December 4, 2023
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive studyDanielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer C Stone, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|April 22, 2026
Top 20 research priorities on methods of co-production in evidence synthesisDominic Ledinger, Alex Todhunter-Brown, Maureen Smith, et al.
Campbell Systematic Reviews|October 17, 2024
Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic reviewLyubov Lytvyn, Jennifer Petkovic, Joanne Khabsa, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|March 24, 2024
An international modified Delphi process supported updating the web-based "right review" toolBarbara Clyne, Melissa K Sharp, Michelle O' Neill, et al.
BMJ Quality & Safety|May 24, 2024
What do clinical practice guidelines say about deprescribing? A scoping reviewAili Veronica Langford, Imaan Warriach, Aisling M McEvoy, et al.
Pageof 9