Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

David Moher

Showing results (401-410 of 829) with videos related to

Pageof 83
Sort By:
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao = Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine|September 15, 2010
[Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement (Chinese version)]Macpherson Hugh, Douglas G Altman, Richard Hammerschlag, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|July 19, 2014
Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reportingHeather L Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, Kelly K O'Brien, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|June 10, 2017
Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research studyAgnes Dechartres, Ludovic Trinquart, Ignacio Atal, et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases|April 13, 2017
Efficacy and completion rates of rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP) compared to other treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review with network meta-analysesChristopher Pease, Brian Hutton, Fatemeh Yazdi, et al.
Trials|November 12, 2021
Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trialMelissa L Rethlefsen, Sara Schroter, Lex M Bouter, et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica|September 13, 2021
Tranexamic acid for prevention of bleeding in cesarean delivery: An overview of systematic reviewsTomi Hurskainen, Mimi X Deng, Cole Etherington, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 13, 2021
Time to improve the reporting of harms in randomized controlled trialsDaniela R Junqueira, Rachel Phillips, Liliane Zorzela, et al.
Systematic Reviews|April 16, 2014
Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementationJelena Savović, Laura Weeks, Jonathan A C Sterne, et al.
The Lancet. Digital Health|November 16, 2024
Attitudes and perceptions of medical researchers towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in the scientific process: an international cross-sectional surveyJeremy Y Ng, Sharleen G Maduranayagam, Nirekah Suthakar, et al.
Plos Biology|November 5, 2024
Biomedical researchers' perspectives on the reproducibility of researchKelly D Cobey, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Matthew J Page, et al.
Pageof 83

Showing results (401-410 of 829) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 83
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao = Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine|September 15, 2010
[Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement (Chinese version)]Macpherson Hugh, Douglas G Altman, Richard Hammerschlag, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|July 19, 2014
Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reportingHeather L Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, Kelly K O'Brien, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|June 10, 2017
Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research studyAgnes Dechartres, Ludovic Trinquart, Ignacio Atal, et al.
BMC Infectious Diseases|April 13, 2017
Efficacy and completion rates of rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP) compared to other treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review with network meta-analysesChristopher Pease, Brian Hutton, Fatemeh Yazdi, et al.
Trials|November 12, 2021
Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trialMelissa L Rethlefsen, Sara Schroter, Lex M Bouter, et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica|September 13, 2021
Tranexamic acid for prevention of bleeding in cesarean delivery: An overview of systematic reviewsTomi Hurskainen, Mimi X Deng, Cole Etherington, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|May 13, 2021
Time to improve the reporting of harms in randomized controlled trialsDaniela R Junqueira, Rachel Phillips, Liliane Zorzela, et al.
Systematic Reviews|April 16, 2014
Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementationJelena Savović, Laura Weeks, Jonathan A C Sterne, et al.
The Lancet. Digital Health|November 16, 2024
Attitudes and perceptions of medical researchers towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in the scientific process: an international cross-sectional surveyJeremy Y Ng, Sharleen G Maduranayagam, Nirekah Suthakar, et al.
Plos Biology|November 5, 2024
Biomedical researchers' perspectives on the reproducibility of researchKelly D Cobey, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Matthew J Page, et al.
Pageof 83