Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

David Moher

Showing results (531-540 of 829) with videos related to

Pageof 83
Sort By:
Plos One|May 13, 2015
The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting GuidelinesStuart G Nicholls, Pauline Quach, Erik von Elm, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|February 17, 2007
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsBeverley J Shea, Jeremy M Grimshaw, George A Wells, et al.
Plos Biology|April 19, 2021
The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvementChristiaan H Vinkers, Herm J Lamberink, Joeri K Tijdink, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 8, 2023
Transparency, openness, and reproducible research practices are frequently underused in health economic evaluationsFerrán Catalá-López, Manuel Ridao, Laura Tejedor-Romero, et al.
Frontiers in Public Health|October 2, 2023
Protocol of the CONSORT and SPIRIT Extension for multicenter clinical trialsXuan Zhang, Chongya Dong, Nana Wang, et al.
BMJ Open|February 19, 2026
Establishing patient perceptions and preferences for a journal transparency tool to support health literacy: a mixed-methods online survey and focus group study of Canada-based patientsAlicia Ricketts, Manoj M Lalu, Laurie Proulx, et al.
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.)|April 27, 2026
The Benefits and Harms of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older: A Systematic ReviewAlexandria Bennett, Niyati Vyas, Nicole Shaver, et al.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition|June 9, 2007
A collaborative effort to apply the evidence-based review process to the field of nutrition: challenges, benefits, and lessons learnedEthan M Balk, Tanya A Horsley, Sydne J Newberry, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|July 23, 2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|July 23, 2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, et al.
Pageof 83

Showing results (531-540 of 829) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 83
Plos One|May 13, 2015
The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting GuidelinesStuart G Nicholls, Pauline Quach, Erik von Elm, et al.
BMC Medical Research Methodology|February 17, 2007
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsBeverley J Shea, Jeremy M Grimshaw, George A Wells, et al.
Plos Biology|April 19, 2021
The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvementChristiaan H Vinkers, Herm J Lamberink, Joeri K Tijdink, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology|November 8, 2023
Transparency, openness, and reproducible research practices are frequently underused in health economic evaluationsFerrán Catalá-López, Manuel Ridao, Laura Tejedor-Romero, et al.
Frontiers in Public Health|October 2, 2023
Protocol of the CONSORT and SPIRIT Extension for multicenter clinical trialsXuan Zhang, Chongya Dong, Nana Wang, et al.
BMJ Open|February 19, 2026
Establishing patient perceptions and preferences for a journal transparency tool to support health literacy: a mixed-methods online survey and focus group study of Canada-based patientsAlicia Ricketts, Manoj M Lalu, Laurie Proulx, et al.
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.)|April 27, 2026
The Benefits and Harms of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older: A Systematic ReviewAlexandria Bennett, Niyati Vyas, Nicole Shaver, et al.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition|June 9, 2007
A collaborative effort to apply the evidence-based review process to the field of nutrition: challenges, benefits, and lessons learnedEthan M Balk, Tanya A Horsley, Sydne J Newberry, et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine|July 23, 2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, et al.
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)|July 23, 2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, et al.
Pageof 83