Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

David R Dance

Showing results (11-20 of 44) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
Medical Physics|February 7, 2007
Monte Carlo modelling of a-Si EPID response: the effect of spectral variations with field size and positionLaure Parent, Joao Seco, Phil M Evans, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|April 12, 2018
Lesion detectability in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using different targets and observersPremkumar Elangovan, Alistair Mackenzie, David R Dance, et al.
Medical Physics|December 13, 2006
Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltagesMichael Sandborg, Anders Tingberg, Gustaf Ullman, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|June 24, 2005
A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammographyGustaf Ullman, Michael Sandborg, David R Dance, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|June 4, 2005
Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imagingGustaf Ullman, Michael Sandborg, David R Dance, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|May 26, 2006
Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modellingGustaf Ullman, Michael Sandborg, David R Dance, et al.
Academic Radiology|July 26, 2002
How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?Walter Huda, Anthony M Sajewicz, Kent M Ogden, et al.
Medical Physics|May 8, 2012
Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray systemAlistair Mackenzie, David R Dance, Adam Workman, et al.
Academic Radiology|October 31, 2006
How do lesion size and random noise affect detection performance in digital mammography?Walter Huda, Kent M Ogden, Ernest M Scalzetti, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|March 6, 2010
A Monte Carlo-based model for simulation of digital chest tomosynthesisGustaf Ullman, David R Dance, Michael Sandborg, et al.
Pageof 5

Showing results (11-20 of 44) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Medical Physics|February 7, 2007
Monte Carlo modelling of a-Si EPID response: the effect of spectral variations with field size and positionLaure Parent, Joao Seco, Phil M Evans, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|April 12, 2018
Lesion detectability in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using different targets and observersPremkumar Elangovan, Alistair Mackenzie, David R Dance, et al.
Medical Physics|December 13, 2006
Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltagesMichael Sandborg, Anders Tingberg, Gustaf Ullman, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|June 24, 2005
A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammographyGustaf Ullman, Michael Sandborg, David R Dance, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|June 4, 2005
Distributions of scatter-to-primary and signal-to-noise ratios per pixel in digital chest imagingGustaf Ullman, Michael Sandborg, David R Dance, et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology|May 26, 2006
Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modellingGustaf Ullman, Michael Sandborg, David R Dance, et al.
Academic Radiology|July 26, 2002
How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?Walter Huda, Anthony M Sajewicz, Kent M Ogden, et al.
Medical Physics|May 8, 2012
Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray systemAlistair Mackenzie, David R Dance, Adam Workman, et al.
Academic Radiology|October 31, 2006
How do lesion size and random noise affect detection performance in digital mammography?Walter Huda, Kent M Ogden, Ernest M Scalzetti, et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry|March 6, 2010
A Monte Carlo-based model for simulation of digital chest tomosynthesisGustaf Ullman, David R Dance, Michael Sandborg, et al.
Pageof 5