Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

David R Senn

Showing results (1-10 of 12) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
Forensic Science International|May 25, 2010
Dental age estimation utilizing third molar development: A review of principles, methods, and population studies used in the United StatesJames M Lewis, David R Senn
Journal of the California Dental Association|July 2, 2015
Forensic Dental Age Estimation: An OverviewJames M Lewis, David R Senn
Journal of Forensic Sciences|December 31, 2005
Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal dispositionAdam J Freeman, David R Senn, Douglas M Arendt
Journal of Forensic Sciences|February 4, 2009
GrinLine identification using digital imaging and Adobe PhotoshopSusan A Bollinger, Paula C Brumit, Bruce A Schrader, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|August 3, 2006
A comparison of animal jaws and bite mark patternsDenise C Murmann, Paula C Brumit, Bruce A Schrader, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|December 2, 2008
Computer-aided dental identification: an objective method for assessment of radiographic image similarityDiane J Flint, Stephen Brent Dove, Paula C Brumit, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|May 13, 2009
Reliability of third molar development for age estimation in a Texas Hispanic population: a comparison studyKathleen A Kasper, Dana Austin, Alan H Kvanli, et al.
Pediatric Dentistry|January 22, 2004
Reporting of child abuse: a follow-up survey of Texas dentistsSamer A Bsoul, Diane J Flint, S Brent Dove, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|July 16, 2010
Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identificationDirk T van der Meer, Paula C Brumit, Bruce A Schrader, et al.
Plos One|August 8, 2013
Analysis of radiocarbon, stable isotopes and DNA in teeth to facilitate identification of unknown decedentsKanar Alkass, Hisako Saitoh, Bruce A Buchholz, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 12) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Forensic Science International|May 25, 2010
Dental age estimation utilizing third molar development: A review of principles, methods, and population studies used in the United StatesJames M Lewis, David R Senn
Journal of the California Dental Association|July 2, 2015
Forensic Dental Age Estimation: An OverviewJames M Lewis, David R Senn
Journal of Forensic Sciences|December 31, 2005
Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal dispositionAdam J Freeman, David R Senn, Douglas M Arendt
Journal of Forensic Sciences|February 4, 2009
GrinLine identification using digital imaging and Adobe PhotoshopSusan A Bollinger, Paula C Brumit, Bruce A Schrader, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|August 3, 2006
A comparison of animal jaws and bite mark patternsDenise C Murmann, Paula C Brumit, Bruce A Schrader, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|December 2, 2008
Computer-aided dental identification: an objective method for assessment of radiographic image similarityDiane J Flint, Stephen Brent Dove, Paula C Brumit, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|May 13, 2009
Reliability of third molar development for age estimation in a Texas Hispanic population: a comparison studyKathleen A Kasper, Dana Austin, Alan H Kvanli, et al.
Pediatric Dentistry|January 22, 2004
Reporting of child abuse: a follow-up survey of Texas dentistsSamer A Bsoul, Diane J Flint, S Brent Dove, et al.
Journal of Forensic Sciences|July 16, 2010
Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identificationDirk T van der Meer, Paula C Brumit, Bruce A Schrader, et al.
Plos One|August 8, 2013
Analysis of radiocarbon, stable isotopes and DNA in teeth to facilitate identification of unknown decedentsKanar Alkass, Hisako Saitoh, Bruce A Buchholz, et al.
Pageof 2