Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

David W Murray

Showing results (51-60 of 199) with videos related to

Pageof 20
Sort By:
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics|September 11, 2015
Real-Time 3D Tracking and Reconstruction on Mobile PhonesVictor Adrian Prisacariu, Olaf Kähler, David W Murray, et al.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume|July 6, 2018
Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and WalesGulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, David W Murray, et al.
The Journal of Arthroplasty|October 7, 2021
A Matched Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacements in Different Ages Based on National Databases: Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Alexander D Liddle, Andrew Judge, et al.
The Knee|March 3, 2020
New surgical instrumentation reduces the revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement: A propensity score matched comparison of 15,906 knees from the National Joint RegistryHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation|April 1, 2008
Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?Meredith A Newman, Karen L Barker, Hemant Pandit, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica|May 19, 2020
A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Maturitas|September 14, 2016
Fracture healing in the elderly: A reviewBradley A Foulke, Adrian R Kendal, David W Murray, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica|August 24, 2017
Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic reviewHasan R Mohammad, Louise Strickland, Thomas W Hamilton, et al.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine|October 26, 2021
The Oxford Domed Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement implant: Increasing wall height reduces the risk of bearing dislocationIrene Yang, Jonathan D Gammell, David W Murray, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica|October 23, 2019
Comparison of the 10-year outcomes of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Pageof 20

Showing results (51-60 of 199) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 20
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics|September 11, 2015
Real-Time 3D Tracking and Reconstruction on Mobile PhonesVictor Adrian Prisacariu, Olaf Kähler, David W Murray, et al.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume|July 6, 2018
Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and WalesGulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, David W Murray, et al.
The Journal of Arthroplasty|October 7, 2021
A Matched Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacements in Different Ages Based on National Databases: Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Alexander D Liddle, Andrew Judge, et al.
The Knee|March 3, 2020
New surgical instrumentation reduces the revision rate of unicompartmental knee replacement: A propensity score matched comparison of 15,906 knees from the National Joint RegistryHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation|April 1, 2008
Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?Meredith A Newman, Karen L Barker, Hemant Pandit, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica|May 19, 2020
A matched comparison of revision rates of cemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements with Single and Twin Peg femoral components, based on data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Maturitas|September 14, 2016
Fracture healing in the elderly: A reviewBradley A Foulke, Adrian R Kendal, David W Murray, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica|August 24, 2017
Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic reviewHasan R Mohammad, Louise Strickland, Thomas W Hamilton, et al.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine|October 26, 2021
The Oxford Domed Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement implant: Increasing wall height reduces the risk of bearing dislocationIrene Yang, Jonathan D Gammell, David W Murray, et al.
Acta Orthopaedica|October 23, 2019
Comparison of the 10-year outcomes of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of ManHasan R Mohammad, Gulraj S Matharu, Andrew Judge, et al.
Pageof 20